Identify each check with a unique id?

[AlexandreDecan]

Hello,

Thanks for this nice tool! We would like to conduct some study on the common mistakes that are made in workflow files, and we plan to rely on actionlint to do so. However, the tool outputs a list of "error/warning messages" that we need to parse to map them to the various checks provided by the tool. Not only this parsing is not convenient, but is likely to be error prone if the messages change over time. Is there any way to identify each check with a unique identifier? (e.g., "unexpected key" could be id 1, "missing key" id 2, "duplicated key" id 3, and so on) By doing so, it makes it easier to collect metrics and, for example, to ignore some specific checks if needed (so it's not only useful for us, as researchers wanting to analyse workflow files, but also for users and tool integrators ;-))

Thanks for your feedback!

[AlexandreDecan]

I'm closing this since I found it's a duplicate, see #75

[AlexandreDecan]

And related to this, as a "workaround" for not having unique IDs: #311