Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update EnricoMi/publish-unit-test-result-action action to v1.27 #210

Merged

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jan 19, 2022

WhiteSource Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
EnricoMi/publish-unit-test-result-action action minor v1.26 -> v1.27

Release Notes

EnricoMi/publish-unit-test-result-action

v1.27

Compare Source

Adds the following features:

  • Fix creating checks with more than 50 annotations (#​215)
  • Fix an endless loop when a test name is larger than 64 kB (#​215)
  • Add logging the URL of the created check (#​215)

Configuration

📅 Schedule: At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, click this checkbox.

This PR has been generated by WhiteSource Renovate. View repository job log here.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 19, 2022

Unit Test Results

  16 files  ±0    16 suites  ±0   4s ⏱️ ±0s
130 tests ±0  130 ✔️ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ±0 

Results for commit a1ee61c. ± Comparison against base commit 6b31e1e.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@ricardorlg ricardorlg merged commit eb7fa99 into main Jan 19, 2022
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/enricomi-publish-unit-test-result-action-1.x branch January 19, 2022 16:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants