Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add an interleaver option when generating an RB sequence #673

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 15, 2018
Merged

add an interleaver option when generating an RB sequence #673

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 15, 2018

Conversation

ecpeterson
Copy link
Contributor

@ecpeterson ecpeterson commented Nov 7, 2018

Adds an option to BenchmarkConnection's RB sequence generator to interleave a fixed Clifford through the sequence.

Depends on rigetti/rpcq#12; do not merge until that is in.

qubits=qubits,
gateset=gateset_for_api,
seed=seed,
interleaver=interleaver)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

how does rpcq work? If I upgrade my pyquil but leave interleaver=None, will rpcq accept it or throw an error? if the latter, do we need to bump requirements.txt

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

rpcq/messages.py:505: UserWarning: Message RandomizedBenchmarkingRequest ignoring unexpected keyword arguments: interleaver.

It whines, but it doesn't die.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is that what youre asking @mpharrigan? if you upgrade pyquil but not the reqs?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes thanks

@mpharrigan mpharrigan merged commit e5a22aa into rigetti:master Nov 15, 2018
@karalekas karalekas added this to the v2.1.0 milestone Nov 27, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants