Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ZIR-292: Store bazel cache so recompile is faster #11

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 13, 2024
Merged

ZIR-292: Store bazel cache so recompile is faster #11

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 13, 2024

Conversation

shkoo
Copy link
Contributor

@shkoo shkoo commented Aug 20, 2024

No description provided.

@shkoo shkoo force-pushed the nils/ci branch 2 times, most recently from 1ebc089 to 0e807bf Compare August 21, 2024 00:06
Copy link
Contributor

@jacobdweightman jacobdweightman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems nice (assuming it works reliably), any reason it's still marked as draft?

@shkoo
Copy link
Contributor Author

shkoo commented Sep 5, 2024

This seems nice (assuming it works reliably), any reason it's still marked as draft?

Yeah, apparently the runners are persistent under some circumstances, so in that case this PR would just add additional work to save and restore the cache. I haven't finished researching this, but feel free to take this over if you'd like! :)

@github-actions github-actions bot changed the title Store bazel cache so recompile is faster ZIR-292: Store bazel cache so recompile is faster Dec 13, 2024
@shkoo shkoo marked this pull request as ready for review December 13, 2024 21:24
@shkoo shkoo enabled auto-merge (squash) December 13, 2024 21:25
@shkoo shkoo merged commit c6fdb7d into main Dec 13, 2024
18 checks passed
@shkoo shkoo deleted the nils/ci branch December 13, 2024 22:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants