You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
sail-model currently has no pre-built files (I haven't found it yet) available for download, building it in codespace (default using 2c 8g) is not very fast
make -j$(nproc) 709.97s user 73.81s system 103% cpu 12:34.03 total
Considering the previous situation of running tests locally, the performance of codespace by default may not be sufficient? I haven't yet calculated how long it takes to run all the coverage.
here is the time taken to run basic RV64I: 39.21s user 1.63s system 9% cpu 7:00.56 total
Even if the performance is really insufficient, users can switch to local Docker for development, and VSCode has very good support for this, consistent with the Codespace experience. So I don't think performance is an big problem
Privide a ready-make config for GitHub codespace, this could help beginners participate in ACT.
Some points that need to be considered:
make -j$(nproc) 709.97s user 73.81s system 103% cpu 12:34.03 total
39.21s user 1.63s system 9% cpu 7:00.56 total
time riscof coverage --config=config.ini --suite=riscv-arch-test/riscv-test-suite/ --env=riscv-arch-test/riscv-test-suite/env \ --cgf-file=./riscv-arch-test/coverage/dataset.cgf \ --cgf-file=./riscv-arch-test/coverage/i/rv64i.cgf \ --cgf-file=./riscv-arch-test/coverage/priv/rv64i_priv.cgf
Even if the performance is really insufficient, users can switch to local Docker for development, and VSCode has very good support for this, consistent with the Codespace experience. So I don't think performance is an big problem
Originally posted by @trdthg in #542 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: