Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RUSTSEC-2023-0086: Multiple soundness issues #18723

Open
github-actions bot opened this issue Sep 26, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

RUSTSEC-2023-0086: Multiple soundness issues #18723

github-actions bot opened this issue Sep 26, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Multiple soundness issues

Details
Status unsound
Package lexical-core
Version 0.8.5
URL
Date 2023-09-03

RUSTSEC-2024-0377 contains multiple soundness issues:

  1. Bytes::read() allows creating instances of types with invalid bit patterns
  2. BytesIter::read() advances iterators out of bounds
  3. The BytesIter trait has safety invariants but is public and not marked unsafe
  4. write_float() calls MaybeUninit::assume_init() on uninitialized data, which is is not allowed by the Rust abstract machine
  5. radix() calls MaybeUninit::assume_init() on uninitialized data, which is is not allowed by the Rust abstract machine

Version 1.0 fixes these issues, removes the vast majority of unsafe code, and also fixes some correctness issues.

See advisory page for additional details.

Copy link
Contributor Author

This issue has been open for 60 days with no activity.

If you think it is still relevant today, and needs to be done in the near future, you can comment to update the status, or just manually remove the no-issue-activity label.

You can also confidently close this issue as not planned to keep our backlog clean.
Don't worry if you think the issue is still valuable to continue in the future.
It's searchable and can be reopened when it's time. 😄

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

0 participants