Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Adjust JSON schema #206

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 25, 2024
Merged

chore: Adjust JSON schema #206

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 25, 2024

Conversation

nickdnk
Copy link
Member

@nickdnk nickdnk commented Oct 25, 2024

Add documentation for HTTP3 experimental

Reason for This PR

Followup to consolidated schemas. Also the HTTP3 section was missing.

Description of Changes

Adjusted schema; dereferenced HashmapString from main repo
Added HTTP 3 schema (with experimental warning)

License Acceptance

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under
the terms of the MIT license.

PR Checklist

[Author TODO: Meet these criteria.]
[Reviewer TODO: Verify that these criteria are met. Request changes if not]

  • All commits in this PR are signed (git commit -s).
  • The reason for this PR is clearly provided (issue no. or explanation).
  • The description of changes is clear and encompassing.
  • Any required documentation changes (code and docs) are included in this PR.
  • Any user-facing changes are mentioned in CHANGELOG.md.
  • All added/changed functionality is tested.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced support for HTTP/3 settings, enhancing performance and capabilities.
    • Added a new Headers definition to improve header management.
  • Improvements

    • Clarified descriptions for custom HTTP headers in requests and responses.
    • Updated trusted_subnets with default values for common private networks.
    • Enhanced clarity for max_request_size and internal_error_code properties.

@nickdnk nickdnk added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Oct 25, 2024
@nickdnk nickdnk requested a review from rustatian October 25, 2024 02:36
@nickdnk nickdnk self-assigned this Oct 25, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 25, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes to the schema.json file for the RoadRunner HTTP plugin introduce several enhancements. A new section for HTTP/3 settings is added, including properties for address, cert, and key. The headers property has been updated to use a new Headers definition, ensuring a minimum of one property with specific key restrictions. Descriptions for request and response headers have been clarified, and the trusted_subnets property now includes default values for private network ranges. Additionally, clarifications have been made for max_request_size and internal_error_code.

Changes

File Change Summary
schema.json - Added new section for HTTP/3 settings with properties address, cert, key.
- Updated headers property to use new Headers definition, replacing HashmapString references.
- Clarified descriptions for request and response headers in headers and static sections.
- Updated trusted_subnets to include default values for common private networks.
- Clarified max_request_size to indicate it represents size in MB with a default of 1000 MB.
- Clarified internal_error_code to default to 500 if not provided.

Poem

In the fields where bunnies play,
New settings hop in bright array.
With headers clear and sizes set,
HTTP/3, we won't forget!
A schema fresh, a joyful cheer,
For RoadRunner, we hold dear! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4383e1a and 043f0ed.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • schema.json (4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
schema.json (4)

205-210: LGTM: Static section header changes are consistent.

The changes to the static section's request and response headers are consistent with the main headers section and use the same Headers definition appropriately.


226-227: LGTM: HTTP3 property addition is well-structured.

The HTTP3 property is correctly added and follows the same pattern as the existing HTTP2 property.


495-504: LGTM: Headers definition is well-designed.

The new Headers definition is a good improvement over HashmapString:

  • Enforces minimum of one property
  • Validates header names against HTTP conventions
  • Ensures non-empty string values

145-146: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix typo in headers description and verify reference change.

  1. There's a typo in both descriptions: "Customer" should be "Custom"
  2. The change from HashmapString to Headers reference looks good, as it adds additional validation for header names.

Let's verify no other parts of the schema still reference HashmapString:

Also applies to: 149-150

schema.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
schema.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
schema.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@nickdnk
Copy link
Member Author

nickdnk commented Oct 25, 2024

@rustatian Should be good now.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
schema.json (1)

503-512: Consider adding examples to Headers definition.

The Headers definition is well-structured with appropriate validations. Consider adding examples to demonstrate valid header names and values, similar to other definitions in the schema.

   "Headers": {
     "type": "object",
     "minProperties": 1,
     "patternProperties": {
       "^[a-zA-Z0-9._-]+$": {
         "type": "string",
         "minLength": 1
+        "examples": [
+          "X-Custom-Header"
+        ]
       }
     },
     "additionalProperties": false,
+    "examples": {
+      "X-Custom-Header": "value",
+      "X-Request-ID": "correlation-id"
+    }
   }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 043f0ed and 2b632ba.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • schema.json (4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
schema.json (3)

145-146: LGTM! Headers definition updates improve clarity and consistency.

The changes consistently update all header properties to use the new Headers definition and provide clearer descriptions specifying "Custom HTTP headers".

Also applies to: 149-150, 205-210


226-227: LGTM! HTTP3 property correctly added.

The HTTP3 configuration is properly integrated alongside existing HTTP2 configuration.


470-502: Consider clarifying the experimental status impact.

The HTTP3 definition is well-structured with proper validations. Consider enhancing the experimental warning to clarify what happens if experimental features are not enabled (e.g., will it be ignored, cause an error, etc?).

@nickdnk nickdnk merged commit f531a02 into master Oct 25, 2024
7 checks passed
@nickdnk nickdnk deleted the add_schema branch October 25, 2024 14:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants