Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feature: Reference plugin JSON schemas #2035

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Oct 29, 2024

Conversation

nickdnk
Copy link
Member

@nickdnk nickdnk commented Oct 25, 2024

Reason for This PR

All schemas for plugins have been moved to their own repositories.

We now validate these schemas by pulling them in by reference with node, then running the validation test on the complete schema.

This makes updating plugins a lot easier, as you will now have to update the JSON schema at the same time, ensuring a 1:1 update of properties and features.

I have fixed some errors in the template .rr.yaml file in the process.

Description of Changes

Removed all inline schemas for plugins.
Updated tests to run on this new model.
Fixed errors in .rr.yaml detected by fixed schemas.

Reference all repos with $ref.

License Acceptance

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the MIT license.

PR Checklist

[Author TODO: Meet these criteria.]
[Reviewer TODO: Verify that these criteria are met. Request changes if not]

  • All commits in this PR are signed (git commit -s).
  • The reason for this PR is clearly provided (issue no. or explanation).
  • The description of changes is clear and encompassing.
  • Any required documentation changes (code and docs) are included in this PR.
  • Any user-facing changes are mentioned in CHANGELOG.md.
  • All added/changed functionality is tested.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced modularity and maintainability of the configuration schema by introducing several new properties that reference external schemas for various components, including AMQP, Beanstalk, and more.
    • The "version" property is now required in the main configuration file.
    • A new GitHub Actions workflow for JSON schema validation has been added to automate the validation process.
    • A new package.json file has been created for schema tests, including essential dependencies.
  • Improvements

    • Simplified the "centrifuge" property to reference an external schema.
    • Updated definitions for "rpc," "server," and "service" properties to enhance clarity and structure.
    • Updated the README to reflect new validation instructions and Docker image version.
    • Adjusted configuration options for improved flexibility, including changes to logging and metrics settings.
    • Added support for validating YAML configuration files against the JSON schema.
    • Configuration file modifications enhance clarity and flexibility in setup.
    • The output fields in the logs section have been updated to support multiple outputs.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 25, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces substantial changes to the JSON schema for the RoadRunner main configuration file. Key modifications include the correction of a grammatical error in the description field, the requirement of a "version" property, and the addition of multiple new properties that reference external schemas. The schema has been restructured to enhance modularity by replacing inline definitions with external references for various components, leading to a more maintainable configuration structure. Additionally, a new GitHub Actions workflow for JSON schema validation has been created, while an existing validation job has been removed.

Changes

File Change Summary
schemas/config/3.0.schema.json - Updated description field for grammatical correction.
- Required "version" property added, replacing "minProperties."
- Added properties referencing external schemas for "amqp," "beanstalk," "fileserver," etc.
- Simplified "centrifuge" property to reference an external schema.
- Redefined "rpc," "server," and "service" properties to reference external schemas.
- Removed definitions for "TLSCAFile," "TLSCertFile," etc., indicating a shift to external schemas.
.github/workflows/schema.yaml - Introduced new GitHub Actions workflow rr_json_schema_validation for validating JSON schemas.
.github/workflows/tests.yml - Removed job validate-config-file from the workflow, simplifying the process.
.gitignore - Added entry to ignore **/node_modules.
.rr.yaml - Commented out user, group, and output fields indicating optional status.
- Updated output and err_output fields in logs section to array format.
- Adjusted read_buf_size parameter for TCP servers and updated metric definitions.
schemas/package.json - Created new package.json for "roadrunner-schema-tests" with dependencies and metadata.
schemas/readme.md - Updated validation instructions and Docker image version in README.
schemas/test.js - Introduced test.js for validating YAML config against JSON schema.

Possibly related PRs

  • fix services.exec_timeout schema definition #1982: This PR addresses the schema definition for services.exec_timeout, which is relevant to the main PR's changes in the JSON schema for configuration files, particularly regarding time-related parameters.
  • feature: Tightly couple all JSON schemas and code/plugins #2030: The changes in this PR involve significant updates to the JSON schema for the RoadRunner configuration file, specifically in schemas/config/3.0.schema.json, which directly relates to the modifications made in the main PR regarding the restructuring and enhancement of the schema.

Suggested labels

B-bug

Suggested reviewers

  • rustatian

Poem

🐇 In the fields where schemas grow,
A rabbit hops with joy, you know!
With properties new and references bright,
The config shines, a lovely sight!
External links, oh what a treat,
Making our code so much more neat! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@nickdnk nickdnk marked this pull request as draft October 25, 2024 03:57
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 25, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 35.95%. Comparing base (5ab0be4) to head (dfe53b9).
Report is 4 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2035   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   35.95%   35.95%           
=======================================
  Files          17       17           
  Lines        1018     1018           
=======================================
  Hits          366      366           
  Misses        621      621           
  Partials       31       31           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
schemas/config/3.0.schema.json (2)

5-5: Fix grammatical error in description

Change "should contains" to "should contain" for correct grammar.

-	"description": "This is your main RoadRunner configuration file. It should contains all the plugins you want to load and their configuration.",
+	"description": "This is your main RoadRunner configuration file. It should contain all the plugins you want to load and their configuration.",

Line range hint 1-99: Consider adding documentation for schema distribution

Since this is a significant architectural change moving from monolithic to distributed schemas, please consider:

  1. Adding documentation explaining the new schema structure and relationships
  2. Providing migration guidelines for users updating from previous versions
  3. Including information about schema versioning strategy
  4. Documenting the distinction between plugins using #/definitions/driver vs direct schema references

This will help users understand and adapt to the new architecture.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7eb793e and 7c63c8b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • schemas/config/3.0.schema.json (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
schemas/config/3.0.schema.json (2)

7-9: LGTM! Good practice requiring the version field.

Making the version field required helps ensure proper schema versioning and compatibility.


Line range hint 83-99: LGTM! Well-defined Duration type.

The Duration definition is comprehensive with clear pattern matching and helpful examples.

Implement new test logic for schema validation
Fix actual errors in .rr.yaml template
@nickdnk nickdnk marked this pull request as ready for review October 25, 2024 21:51
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 8

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
schemas/config/3.0.schema.json (2)

5-5: Fix grammatical error in description

Change "should contains" to "should contain"

-	"description": "This is your main RoadRunner configuration file. It should contains all the plugins you want to load and their configuration.",
+	"description": "This is your main RoadRunner configuration file. It should contain all the plugins you want to load and their configuration.",

Line range hint 1-1: Use versioned reference in schema $id

The schema's $id uses a master branch reference which could lead to breaking changes. Consider using a specific version tag for better stability.

-	"$id": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roadrunner-server/roadrunner/refs/heads/master/schemas/config/3.0.schema.json",
+	"$id": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roadrunner-server/roadrunner/v2023.x.x/schemas/config/3.0.schema.json",
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7c63c8b and 4acfcda.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • schemas/package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
  • .github/workflows/schema.yaml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/tests.yml (0 hunks)
  • .gitignore (1 hunks)
  • .rr.yaml (10 hunks)
  • schemas/config/3.0.schema.json (2 hunks)
  • schemas/package.json (1 hunks)
  • schemas/readme.md (1 hunks)
  • schemas/test.js (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/tests.yml
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • schemas/package.json
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
schemas/readme.md

[uncategorized] ~7-~7: You might be missing the article “an” here.
Context: ...directory inside.** - You can validate existing config file using the following command...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_AN)

🪛 Biome
schemas/test.js

[error] 11-11: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.

Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.

(lint/performance/noDelete)


[error] 12-12: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.

Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.

(lint/performance/noDelete)


[error] 15-15: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.

It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.

(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)

🔇 Additional comments (9)
.gitignore (1)

27-27: LGTM! The node_modules ignore pattern is appropriate.

The addition of **/node_modules is necessary and correctly implemented to support the new JSON schema validation workflow. The pattern will properly ignore Node.js dependencies at any directory depth.

Let's verify the necessity of this change by checking for the presence of Node.js related files:

✅ Verification successful

The node_modules ignore pattern is correctly added and necessary

The verification confirms the presence of schemas/package.json, which will generate a node_modules directory when dependencies are installed. The **/node_modules pattern in .gitignore is therefore appropriate and required.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the presence of package.json files that would generate node_modules
# Test: Search for package.json files. Expect: At least one occurrence in schemas/
fd package.json

Length of output: 38

.github/workflows/schema.yaml (1)

27-29: Verify schema validation script implementation.

The workflow depends on test.js in the schemas directory. Please ensure this script:

  1. Properly validates all schema files
  2. Handles errors gracefully
  3. Provides clear validation output
✅ Verification successful

Schema validation script implementation verified successfully

The test.js script properly validates schema files with the following key features:

  1. Uses @apidevtools/json-schema-ref-parser to dereference and resolve all schema references
  2. Implements proper error handling by throwing detailed validation errors
  3. Uses Ajv2019 for JSON Schema validation with strict mode enabled
  4. Handles YAML configuration files correctly using js-yaml
  5. Includes proper schema ID and reference management

The script is well integrated with the necessary dependencies in package.json and correctly validates against the comprehensive RoadRunner configuration schema.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and basic structure of the test script

# Check if test.js exists and show its content
echo "Checking test script existence and content:"
if [ -f "schemas/test.js" ]; then
    cat schemas/test.js
else
    echo "Warning: schemas/test.js not found"
fi

# Check for package.json and its dependencies
echo -e "\nChecking package.json dependencies:"
if [ -f "schemas/package.json" ]; then
    cat schemas/package.json | grep -A 10 '"dependencies":'
else
    echo "Warning: schemas/package.json not found"
fi

Length of output: 1542


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the schema file existence and structure
echo "Checking schema file existence and content:"
if [ -f "schemas/config/3.0.schema.json" ]; then
    cat schemas/config/3.0.schema.json
else
    echo "Warning: schemas/config/3.0.schema.json not found"
fi

# Check if .rr.yaml exists in the parent directory
echo -e "\nChecking .rr.yaml existence:"
if [ -f ".rr.yaml" ]; then
    cat .rr.yaml
else
    echo "Warning: .rr.yaml not found"
fi

Length of output: 68143

schemas/test.js (1)

1-4: LGTM! Appropriate dependencies imported.

The imports are well-chosen for JSON schema validation with proper versioning of Ajv.

schemas/config/3.0.schema.json (1)

Line range hint 84-99: Duration definition looks good

The Duration type definition is well-documented with clear examples and a proper regex pattern.

.rr.yaml (5)

563-581: LGTM: Enhanced service observability configuration.

The addition of detailed service configuration fields (service_name, service_version, service_namespace, service_instance_id) improves observability by providing better service identification and versioning.


1963-1966: LGTM: Well-documented buffer size configuration.

The TCP read buffer size configuration is well documented with clear explanation of its purpose and performance implications. The default value is explicitly stated.


979-991: LGTM: Well-structured metrics configuration.

The metrics configuration follows Prometheus best practices:

  • Summary metric includes properly formatted objectives
  • Histogram metric defines appropriate bucket ranges
  • Both metrics include descriptive help text and type labels

605-605: Verify impact of commented custom_url.

The OpenTelemetry custom URL configuration has been commented out. Ensure this doesn't affect existing telemetry integrations.

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any telemetry endpoint configurations in the codebase
rg -i "custom.*url|telemetry.*endpoint|otel.*endpoint" --type yaml

50-50: Verify security implications of commented-out user/group settings.

The user and group settings for worker processes have been commented out. While this makes the configuration more flexible, it could have security implications as the processes will now run under the default RR process user/group.

Also applies to: 60-60, 65-65

✅ Verification successful

Based on the search results, I can now generate a final response. The changelog entries and configuration documentation provide enough context about the user/group settings in RoadRunner.

User/group settings can be safely commented out

The user/group settings are optional configuration parameters that were actually added as new features in previous releases (see CHANGELOG-2023.md). When these settings are commented out:

  • The worker processes will run under the default system user that started RoadRunner
  • This is a common and valid configuration, especially in containerized environments
  • No security implications as long as RoadRunner itself is started with appropriate permissions
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any security-related documentation or guidelines about process permissions
rg -i "user|group|permission|security" README.md docs/

Length of output: 244


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try to find any configuration examples or documentation files in the repository
fd -e yaml -e yml -e md . | xargs rg -i "user:|group:|permission|security" -A 2 -B 2

# Also search for RoadRunner configuration documentation references
rg -i "roadrunner.+config" -A 2 -B 2

Length of output: 10660

.github/workflows/schema.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/schema.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/schema.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
schemas/test.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
schemas/test.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
schemas/config/3.0.schema.json Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4acfcda and 7c91597.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • schemas/config/3.0.schema.json (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
schemas/config/3.0.schema.json (2)

5-5: LGTM! Description improvement

The updated description is more precise and grammatically correct.


7-9: Breaking change: Version field is now required

This change makes the "version" field mandatory, which could break existing configurations that don't specify it.

Let's check for configurations that might be affected:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find .rr.yaml files missing the version field
# Expected: No .rr.yaml files without version field

echo "Searching for .rr.yaml files without version field..."
fd -e yaml -e yml '.+\.rr\.' -x sh -c '
    if ! grep -q "^version:" "{}"; then
        echo "Missing version in: {}"
        echo "---"
        cat "{}"
        echo "---"
    fi
'

schemas/config/3.0.schema.json Show resolved Hide resolved
Fix invalid metrics examples
Adjust workflow file
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
schemas/test.js (1)

6-20: Add JSDoc documentation for the stripIds function.

The function's purpose and parameters should be clearly documented.

/**
 * Recursively removes $id and $schema properties from nested objects except for the root object.
 * This is necessary to prevent Ajv validation errors when dealing with referenced schemas.
 * 
 * @param {Object} schema - The schema object to process
 * @param {boolean} first - Indicates if this is the root object (true) or a nested object (false)
 */
function stripIds(schema, first) {
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 11-11: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.

Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.

(lint/performance/noDelete)


[error] 12-12: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.

Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.

(lint/performance/noDelete)

.rr.yaml (2)

548-566: Consider adding validation rules for service configuration

The OpenTelemetry service configuration includes important identifiers. Consider adding:

  1. Validation rules for the service name format
  2. Guidelines for version number format (e.g., semver)
  3. Best practices for namespace naming
  4. Format requirements for instance IDs

This will help users provide valid configuration values.


1948-1951: Document memory implications of read buffer size

While the comment explains the performance benefit of a larger buffer size, it would be helpful to also document:

  1. Memory consumption implications (e.g., total memory = buffer_size * num_workers)
  2. Recommended values for different workload types
  3. Warning about potential memory pressure with large values
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7c91597 and e2fd52e.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .github/workflows/schema.yaml (1 hunks)
  • .rr.yaml (11 hunks)
  • schemas/test.js (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/schema.yaml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
schemas/test.js

[error] 11-11: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.

Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.

(lint/performance/noDelete)


[error] 12-12: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.

Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.

(lint/performance/noDelete)

schemas/test.js Show resolved Hide resolved
schemas/test.js Show resolved Hide resolved
schemas/test.js Show resolved Hide resolved
.rr.yaml Show resolved Hide resolved
@rustatian rustatian self-requested a review October 26, 2024 14:12
@rustatian rustatian added the A-docs Area: documentation label Oct 26, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.rr.yaml (1)

549-567: LGTM: Comprehensive OpenTelemetry service configuration

The service identification parameters are well structured. However, consider using a more deterministic value for service_instance_id instead of "UUID" literal.

-    service_instance_id: "UUID"
+    service_instance_id: "${POD_NAME:-UUID}"
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 18132a1 and ab70684.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .rr.yaml (11 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
.rr.yaml (4)

106-106: Breaking change already noted in previous review

Also applies to: 111-111, 152-154, 158-160, 164-166


200-209: LGTM: Well-structured temporal metrics configuration

The configuration follows best practices with clear documentation and appropriate default values.


1949-1952: Consider memory implications of increased read buffer size

The TCP read buffer size has been increased from the default 1MB to 10MB. While this can reduce read syscalls for large payloads, it will increase memory usage per TCP connection. Ensure your server has sufficient memory capacity for the expected number of concurrent connections.

✅ Verification successful

Let me generate additional verification scripts to understand the TCP worker pool configuration and concurrent connection handling:

This will help us understand the connection handling capacity and worker pool settings to better assess the memory impact of the increased buffer size.


Based on the verification results, I can now generate the final response:

Increased read buffer size is reasonable given the configuration

The 10MB read buffer size is appropriate considering:

  • Workers are limited to 128MB memory (max_worker_memory: 128)
  • Number of workers scales with CPU cores (num_workers: 0)
  • No explicit connection limits are set
  • The server appears to be designed for handling large TCP payloads

The memory impact is well-constrained by the worker memory limits, making this a balanced configuration for optimizing between syscall reduction and resource usage.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any TCP-related performance configurations or documentation
rg -A 5 'read_buf_size|buffer_size|memory' --type yaml

Length of output: 2711


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for TCP pool and connection related configurations
rg -A 10 'tcp:.*pool:|num_workers|max_connections' --type yaml

# Search for any TCP-related documentation or comments
rg -B 2 'tcp:' --type yaml

Length of output: 7230


49-49: Security: Consider implications of commented out user/group configurations

Running the server without explicit user/group configurations means it will run with the default RR process permissions. This could be a security concern in production environments.

Also applies to: 64-64

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.rr.yaml (1)

445-445: Consider documenting empty configuration

The memory driver has an empty configuration block. Consider adding a comment explaining that no additional configuration is required for the memory driver.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ab70684 and 5ab0be4.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .rr.yaml (11 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
.rr.yaml (5)

190-235: Well-structured metrics configuration

The temporal metrics configuration is well-organized with comprehensive documentation and appropriate defaults for both Prometheus and Statsd drivers.


549-567: Well-structured OpenTelemetry resource configuration

The service configuration follows OpenTelemetry semantic conventions with clear documentation and appropriate defaults.


1929-1932: Well-documented TCP buffer configuration

The TCP read buffer size configuration is clearly documented with appropriate default value and explanation of its impact on performance.


591-591: Verify impact of optional custom_url

The custom_url configuration has been made optional. Please ensure this change is documented in the changelog and upgrade guide.

#!/bin/bash
# Check if the change is documented
rg -i "custom.?url" CHANGELOG.md docs/

49-49: Security Notice: User/Group Configuration Made Optional

The user and group configurations have been commented out, making them optional. This could have security implications if users are not aware of the default behavior.

Also applies to: 59-59, 64-64

Copy link
Member

@rustatian rustatian left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks @nickdnk 👍

@rustatian rustatian merged commit 3911515 into roadrunner-server:master Oct 29, 2024
6 of 7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-docs Area: documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants