This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 27, 2024. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
fix: streaming responses lock-up under some conditions #105
fix: streaming responses lock-up under some conditions #105
Changes from all commits
34adf20
0d107d1
d41504f
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
Check warning on line 74 in pool/static_pool/debug.go
Codecov / codecov/patch
pool/static_pool/debug.go#L74
Check warning on line 76 in pool/static_pool/debug.go
Codecov / codecov/patch
pool/static_pool/debug.go#L76
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
When a network error occurs, the worker is killed (line 220), but there is no subsequent error handling or retry logic. This could lead to dropped jobs if not properly managed.
+ // TODO: Implement retry logic or error propagation after a worker is killed due to a network error.
Committable suggestion
Check warning on line 227 in pool/static_pool/workers_pool.go
Codecov / codecov/patch
pool/static_pool/workers_pool.go#L224-L227
Check warning on line 233 in pool/static_pool/workers_pool.go
Codecov / codecov/patch
pool/static_pool/workers_pool.go#L233
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Creating a buffered channel with a very large buffer size (line 240) can lead to high memory usage and potential performance issues. Consider using a smaller buffer and proper flow control.
Committable suggestion
Check warning on line 251 in pool/static_pool/workers_pool.go
Codecov / codecov/patch
pool/static_pool/workers_pool.go#L251
Check warning on line 261 in pool/static_pool/workers_pool.go
Codecov / codecov/patch
pool/static_pool/workers_pool.go#L261
Check warning on line 264 in pool/static_pool/workers_pool.go
Codecov / codecov/patch
pool/static_pool/workers_pool.go#L264
Check warning on line 266 in pool/static_pool/workers_pool.go
Codecov / codecov/patch
pool/static_pool/workers_pool.go#L266
Check warning on line 271 in pool/static_pool/workers_pool.go
Codecov / codecov/patch
pool/static_pool/workers_pool.go#L268-L271
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The goroutine started on line 248 for handling stream mode does not have any recovery logic for panics that might occur within it. This could lead to a situation where a panic in one goroutine could potentially affect the stability of the entire application.
+ // TODO: Add recovery logic to the goroutine to handle potential panics gracefully.
Committable suggestion
Check warning on line 288 in pool/static_pool/workers_pool.go
Codecov / codecov/patch
pool/static_pool/workers_pool.go#L276-L288
Check warning on line 292 in pool/static_pool/workers_pool.go
Codecov / codecov/patch
pool/static_pool/workers_pool.go#L291-L292
Check warning on line 300 in pool/static_pool/workers_pool.go
Codecov / codecov/patch
pool/static_pool/workers_pool.go#L295-L300
Check warning on line 317 in pool/static_pool/workers_pool.go
Codecov / codecov/patch
pool/static_pool/workers_pool.go#L303-L317
Check warning on line 322 in pool/static_pool/workers_pool.go
Codecov / codecov/patch
pool/static_pool/workers_pool.go#L321-L322
Check warning on line 330 in pool/static_pool/workers_pool.go
Codecov / codecov/patch
pool/static_pool/workers_pool.go#L325-L330
Check warning on line 337 in pool/static_pool/workers_pool.go
Codecov / codecov/patch
pool/static_pool/workers_pool.go#L333-L337
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The state transition to
StateReady
(line 347) should be verified to ensure that the worker is indeed ready and that there are no pending tasks that could be lost.+ // TODO: Verify that no tasks are lost during the transition to StateReady.
Committable suggestion