Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[serapi] [general] Bump version numbers for 8.11 and wrap libraries #192

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 24, 2020

Conversation

ejgallego
Copy link
Collaborator

We now build the OCaml libraries by default; this may allow us to drop
annoying Serapi_ prefix from module names.

We now build the OCaml libraries by default; this may allow us to drop
annoying `Serapi_` prefix from module names.
@ejgallego ejgallego self-assigned this Jan 24, 2020
@ejgallego ejgallego added this to the 0.11.0 milestone Jan 24, 2020
@ejgallego ejgallego merged commit 70a1710 into v8.11 Jan 24, 2020
@ejgallego ejgallego deleted the v8.11+wrap branch January 24, 2020 23:16
ejgallego added a commit to ejgallego/opam-repository that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2020
CHANGES:

 * [general] (!) support Coq 8.11, a few datatypes have changed, in
             particular `CoqAst` handles locations as an AST node, and
             the kernel type includes primitive floats (@ejgallego).
 * [general] (!) Now the `sertop` and `serapi` OCaml libraries are
             built packed, we've also bumped their compat version number
             (rocq-archive/coq-serapi#192 @ejgallego)
mgree pushed a commit to mgree/opam-repository that referenced this pull request Feb 19, 2020
CHANGES:

 * [general] (!) support Coq 8.11, a few datatypes have changed, in
             particular `CoqAst` handles locations as an AST node, and
             the kernel type includes primitive floats (@ejgallego).
 * [general] (!) Now the `sertop` and `serapi` OCaml libraries are
             built packed, we've also bumped their compat version number
             (rocq-archive/coq-serapi#192 @ejgallego)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant