withQueries decorator syntax

[tailsu]

Improving on #6

withQueries is the same in spirit as, for example, withRouter from react-router. The original connect function remains semantically the same.

Added docs to the README as well as unit tests.

[tailsu]

The PR is best viewed with whitespace changes turned off :)

https://github.com/roman01la/react-horizon/pull/9/files?w=1

[roman01la]

@tailsu I think I like how it is done in #6, where connect can be used both as decorator and as a function. What do you think?

[tailsu]

I'm not sure...

@connect(...)
class MyComponent extends Component {
// ...
}

Okay, it's not that hard to grok, because there will be a bunch of subscriptions and horizon calls inside the connect(), so you can guess that it pertains to horizon. But still...

I guess I just like this @withWhatever style for HOCs that the people from react-router prefer. They have a nice discussion about it here: remix-run/react-router#3350

It's your call, I can redo the PR and overload connect instead.

[tailsu]

By the way, #6 breaks the old syntax for connect, that's why the PR build fails 😼

[roman01la]

Didn't know about React Router is doing it this way. If it's a common naming for such decorators, I agree with the choice. Thanks!

[tailsu]

Great! If it's not too much of a bother, could you publish the new package?

[roman01la]

Yes, sure. Released as v0.4.0

[tailsu]

🎉