-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adding a section "similar work" to README #32
Comments
Hi Sina, Thank you very much for your great feedback and suggestion. I am aware that the similar naming of the packages is unfortunate, but it arose due to historical reasons (please find a detailed explanation here: https://github.com/ropensci/biomartr/blob/master/FAQs.md and here #11). I also dedicated an entire vignette to compare the If it would help then I am happy to also add a section named Many thanks and best wishes, |
Hi Hajk I did know that there was a FAQ file, should have checked. Those are some good explanations, thank you! You could have a very short README section dedicated to Best wishes |
…distinguish the functionality of the BiomaRt versus biomartr packages (Many thanks to @sinarueeger for this suggestion #32)
Hi Sina, Perfect. I now added the new section to the Once more thank you very much for your suggestion and I always welcome feedback :)))) Cheers, |
Great - thanks for adding this! |
I think it would be useful to have a section in the README file that compares biomartr to similar work, most importantly biomaRt.
It would help the user understand the differences between these two packages with almost identical names.
I came across a section like this in the drake package.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: