Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for HC10DTP #541

Closed

Conversation

EricMarcil
Copy link
Contributor

Added support for HC10DTP (1-06VXCP10-B0*)

@ted-miller
Copy link
Contributor

Is there an -A0 variant? What does the B change?

Also, the files are labeled as B10 instead of B0. Is that intentional?

@EricMarcil
Copy link
Contributor Author

Oops, it should be B00, I copied the files from HC10DT-B10 which is similar and added "P" but did realized that I also needed to change the B10 for B00.

Yes, there is a A00 variant. It has blue covers. The flange and some castings are different.
Motion is the same but it is not Dust-Proof/Drip-Proof.
image

Do you also need the A00 version?

@ted-miller
Copy link
Contributor

Do you also need the A00 version?

No. I just didn't know the difference

@gavanderhoorn gavanderhoorn linked an issue Jun 28, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request
@cjue
Copy link
Contributor

cjue commented Aug 9, 2023

just for reference, the full name of the HC10-DTP version with IP67 and "Food grade grease" is YR-1-06VXCP10-B00 according to this datasheet

The non-dust/food-safe version appears to be called "HC10DTP Classic" here, with the model number YR-1-06VXCP10-A00

Both DTP variants have CP10- instead of HC10- in the model number.
The DT variants have the endings HC10-A10 and HC10-B10.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should this file be part of the PR?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I created a PR in Erics repo with the suggestions by gavanderhoorn and some minor corrections by me
EricMarcil#10

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@cjue
Thanks for getting this done.
I've merge the changes to my branch.

@gavanderhoorn
We should be good to merge this pull request.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@EricMarcil could you please rebase your HC10DTP-Update branch to ros-industrial:kinetic-devel? It appears the kinetic-devel in your repo is not identical to the one in ros-industrial.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@cjue Rebase should be done now. Hopefully, I've done it properly.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@cjue Rebase should be done now. Hopefully, I've done it properly.

Almost right, the branch has the right content but the commit history is more complicated because of the merge than it would be with a rebase.

The git CLI commands for rebasing the branch look like this, if you are using the shell:

git checkout HC10DTP-Update

# upstream is my name for the ros-industrial repo
git rebase -i upstream/kinetic-devel  # "-i" allows you to check that exactly the expected commits will be rebased

Copy link
Contributor

@cjue cjue Aug 15, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@cjue So what is our next step here? Do we go with the commit as is? Or do you want to make a new PR?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would prefer a PR with just the four new commits.

I just opened a replacement-PR with the four commits here, without the extra merge of newer kinetic-devel commits:
#573

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@gavanderhoorn all your feedback has been applied in the replacement PR #573

EricMarcil and others added 4 commits August 14, 2023 14:26
Added support for HC10DTP (1-06VXCP10-B0*)
The DTP model was originally set as 'dtp-b10' but it should be 'dtp-b00'.  File names and references were corrected to 'dtp-b00'
@ted-miller
Copy link
Contributor

Closing. Replaced by #573

@ted-miller ted-miller closed this Dec 20, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

HC-10DTP Support Files
4 participants