Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BACKPORT] roslaunch: Allow passing _TIMEOUT_SIGINT and _TIMEOUT_SIGTERM as parameters #2179

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

bergercookie
Copy link

Backport #1937 to melodic.

I think this feature is super useful to have in earlier ROS1 versions as well

@dirk-thomas , I've just cherry-picked the corresponding commit from noetic-devel. Let me know if this 's not the preferred way of backporting features to melodic.

…meters (ros#1937)

* Added --sigint-timeout and --sigterm-timeout parameters.

* Fixed propagating sigint- and sigterm-timeout to remote nodes.

* Added tests for sigint- and sigterm-timeout.

* Decrease CPU load of timeout tests.

* roslaunch: readded DEFAULT_TIMEOUT_SIGINT and DEFAULT_TIMEOUT_SIGTERM

* roslaunch: --sigint_timeout, --sigterm-timeout take floats now

* Fixing int to float in docs for sigint_timeout and sigterm_timeout

* Reduced flakyness of test_roslaunch_parent and test_nodeprocess

* Migrate test/signal_logger.py to Python 3.

* roslaunch: Better exception handling, undoing whitespace changes.

* roslaunch: Fix whitespace.

Co-authored-by: Christopher Wecht <christopher.wecht@student.kit.edu>
@bergercookie bergercookie changed the title roslaunch: Allow passing _TIMEOUT_SIGINT and _TIMEOUT_SIGTERM as para… [BACKPORT] roslaunch: Allow passing _TIMEOUT_SIGINT and _TIMEOUT_SIGTERM as parameters Aug 23, 2021
@dirk-thomas
Copy link
Member

@bergercookie sorry, I am not the maintainer of this repository anymore.

@bergercookie
Copy link
Author

Can I get some feedback on this please?

This could be a quite useful feature to have in melodic

@peci1
Copy link
Contributor

peci1 commented Nov 10, 2021

@mjcarroll @sloretz Could you please have a look at this backport?

@jacobperron
Copy link
Contributor

Including backport of #1937 in #2219

@jacobperron jacobperron closed this Jan 6, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants