-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 331
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add bridge mapping rule for action_tutorials_interfaces #525
Add bridge mapping rule for action_tutorials_interfaces #525
Conversation
Signed-off-by: ruffsl <roxfoxpox@gmail.com>
227004b
to
199f76b
Compare
@ruffsl are you able to create the fibonacci bridge now? |
With ruffsl/ros1_bridge@29ad938 from ruffsl/ros1_bridge#1 I was succesfully able to call the fibonacci servier in ROS1 from a client in ROS2.
However, I was not able to go the other way, I.E calling the fibonacci servier in ROS2 from a client in ROS1. I tried restarting roscore and ros_bridge before repeating the test, but no such luck.
|
@ruffsl Just a note, using your Docker image I had to Just sourcing the noetic setup as you've shown gave me errors finding |
Yep, I've corrected my above comment. |
The command would be
The type strings can be found in |
Oh, great, looks like this works both ways as well, just needed the correct type string.
I now see it's listed within the generated file, but it's not yet obvious why it's namespaced with
|
You could also use
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks good to me once ros2/ros1_bridge#256 is merged in.
Given that we've now removed |
Depends: ros2/ros1_bridge#256 (comment)
CC @ipa-hsd