[YAML Parser] Depend on rcutils only #470
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Michel Hidalgo <michel@ekumenlabs.com>
hidmic
changed the title
| @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ bool rcl_parse_yaml_file( | |||
| const char * file_path, | |||
| rcl_params_t * params_st); | |||
|
|
|||
| /// \brief Print the parameter structure to stdout | |||
| /// \brief Print the parameter structure to | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeap. Fixed in cf8bff1.
rcl_yaml_param_parser/src/parser.c
Outdated
| @@ -170,19 +171,19 @@ static rcl_ret_t add_name_to_ns( | |||
| sep_str = PARAMETER_NS_SEPERATOR; | |||
| break; | |||
| default: | |||
| res = RCL_RET_ERROR; | |||
| ret = RCUTILS_RET_OK; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
RCL_RET_ERROR -> RCUTILS_RET_OK ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Oops. Fixed in cf8bff1.
rcl_yaml_param_parser/src/parser.c
Outdated
| if (NULL == value) { | ||
| RCUTILS_SET_ERROR_MSG("event argument has no value"); | ||
| return RCUTILS_RET_INVALID_ARGUMENT; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Here it makes sense. Done in cf8bff1.
rcl_yaml_param_parser/src/parser.c
Outdated
| return RCL_RET_INVALID_ARGUMENT; | ||
| if (NULL == value) { | ||
| RCUTILS_SET_ERROR_MSG("event argument has no value"); | ||
| return RCUTILS_RET_INVALID_ARGUMENT; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use RCUTILS_CHECK_FOR_NULL_WITH_MSG
rcl_yaml_param_parser/src/parser.c
Outdated
|
|
||
| if (NULL == file_path) { | ||
| RCL_SET_ERROR_MSG("YAML file path is NULL"); | ||
| RCUTILS_SET_ERROR_MSG("YAML file path is NULL"); | ||
| return false; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use RCUTILS_CHECK_ARGUMENT_FOR_NULL
Signed-off-by: Michel Hidalgo <michel@ekumenlabs.com>
| "The name length exceeds the MAX size %d at line %d", MAX_STRING_SIZE, line_num); | ||
| return RCL_RET_OK; | ||
| ret = RCUTILS_RET_ERROR; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
RCUTILS_RET_ERROR -> RCL_RET_OK?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reading it again, I think it was wrong before.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah, that's what I thought.
|
Running CI (up to system_tests to make sure nothing broke downstream):
|
|
Re-running CI, looks like some code in |
|
The sole CI failure on Linux is due to a flake8 complaint on rclpy, which has since been fixed in ros2/rclpy#385. |
Closes #252. In preparation for pushing parameter parsing (from file and command line arguments) down to
rcl.