Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

revert call shutdown in LifecycleNode destructor #2557

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 11, 2024

Conversation

fujitatomoya
Copy link
Collaborator

@fujitatomoya fujitatomoya commented Jun 10, 2024

revert #2528 and #2545

backports are not straight-forward because of the conflicts, so end up having backport PRs for each distro.

This reverts commit d8d83a0.

Signed-off-by: Tomoya Fujita <Tomoya.Fujita@sony.com>
…ce in unknown state (2nd) (#2528)"

This reverts commit 3bc364a.

Signed-off-by: Tomoya Fujita <Tomoya.Fujita@sony.com>
// release sub-interfaces in an order that allows them to consult with node_base during tear-down
node_waitables_.reset();
node_type_descriptions_.reset();
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@fujitatomoya fujitatomoya Jun 10, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is actually bug fix, i will re-submit this after revert as follow-up.

@@ -191,7 +162,6 @@ LifecycleNode::~LifecycleNode()
node_timers_.reset();
node_logging_.reset();
node_graph_.reset();
node_base_.reset();
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@fujitatomoya fujitatomoya Jun 10, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is actually bug fix, i will re-submit this after revert as follow-up.

rclcpp_lifecycle/test/test_lifecycle_node.cpp Show resolved Hide resolved
@fujitatomoya
Copy link
Collaborator Author

CI (--packages-above-and-dependencies rclcpp_lifecycle):

  • Linux Build Status
  • Linux-aarch64 Build Status
  • Linux-rhel Build Status
  • Windows Build Status

@fujitatomoya fujitatomoya merged commit f4923c6 into rolling Jun 11, 2024
2 of 3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants