-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
use deepcopy in set_message_fields for safety. #34
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -208,6 +208,31 @@ def test_set_nested_namespaced_fields(): | |
assert arrays_msg.basic_types_values[2].uint8_value == 0 | ||
|
||
|
||
def test_set_nested_namespaced_fields_with_same_values(): | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This test fails with out this PR. |
||
unbounded_sequence_msg = message_fixtures.get_msg_unbounded_sequences()[1] | ||
test_values = { | ||
'basic_types_values': [ | ||
{'float64_value': 42.42, 'int8_value': 42}, | ||
{'float64_value': 11.11, 'int8_value': 11} | ||
] | ||
} | ||
set_message_fields(unbounded_sequence_msg, test_values) | ||
assert unbounded_sequence_msg.basic_types_values[0].float64_value == 42.42 | ||
assert unbounded_sequence_msg.basic_types_values[0].int8_value == 42 | ||
assert unbounded_sequence_msg.basic_types_values[0].uint8_value == 0 | ||
assert unbounded_sequence_msg.basic_types_values[1].float64_value == 11.11 | ||
assert unbounded_sequence_msg.basic_types_values[1].int8_value == 11 | ||
assert unbounded_sequence_msg.basic_types_values[1].uint8_value == 0 | ||
# This should still succeed because test_values should not be modified | ||
set_message_fields(unbounded_sequence_msg, test_values) | ||
assert unbounded_sequence_msg.basic_types_values[0].float64_value == 42.42 | ||
assert unbounded_sequence_msg.basic_types_values[0].int8_value == 42 | ||
assert unbounded_sequence_msg.basic_types_values[0].uint8_value == 0 | ||
assert unbounded_sequence_msg.basic_types_values[1].float64_value == 11.11 | ||
assert unbounded_sequence_msg.basic_types_values[1].int8_value == 11 | ||
assert unbounded_sequence_msg.basic_types_values[1].uint8_value == 0 | ||
|
||
|
||
def test_set_message_fields_nested_type(): | ||
msg_basic_types = message_fixtures.get_msg_basic_types()[0] | ||
msg0 = message_fixtures.get_msg_nested()[0] | ||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since this function handles the nested structure internally, i would use
deepcopy
for the safety.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does this have any sort of performance impact?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
of course it does. but i think this is not performance sensitive API. (besides python...)