Take two at the re-pull code PR #83
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
lindsayplatt
approved these changes
Apr 5, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@steeleb I just glanced through all the files and was simply doing a check for potential copy/paste errors. If you need a more thorough review, I would pass the baton to a Rossyndicate member :)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Heya!
Okay, this is another PR primarily composed of 'make sure I didn't flub up naming conventions', but a reality check would be welcome! Data successfully have be re-pulled across the Landsat series and Sentinel, too.
There's not a whole lot of 'new' code in here, mostly repurposed from other projects, but a glance at the functions for sense-making would be helpful.
This is progress on #75 and closes #81.