Doc: updates following Rust compilation #231
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Definitely throwing some pedantry at you, here. I'd also be content if you ignore all my grammar suggestions.
If you do make some changes, would you also add the word can to the sentence
If you use BridgeStan in your research, please consider citing our JOSS paper and letting us know so we [can] list your project here.
in the Section Research using BridgeStan of bridgestan/README.md?
docs/languages.rst
Outdated
|
|
||
|
|
||
| Additional "quality of life" features are available on a best-effort basis. | ||
| If you are missing a feature from one interface in your favorite language, we would welcome a |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If you are missing a feature from one interface in your favorite language, we would welcome a contribution
Can we drop the word would?
I'm also hesitant about the word one. Maybe the? Other thoughts?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Rewrote the whole sentence to "If BridgeStan's bindings to your favorite language are missing one of these features, we welcome contributions!"
|
Just stopping by to say I approve of the level of grammatical pedantry on both sides! If you want one more, I don't like "Note that" because it's redundant. And yes please on the citation nudge. |
This is a follow on to #212 with a few extra tweaks to the documentation.