Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Filters have to be common for all users #587

Closed
n-sviridenko opened this issue Nov 20, 2021 · 2 comments · Fixed by #631
Closed

Filters have to be common for all users #587

n-sviridenko opened this issue Nov 20, 2021 · 2 comments · Fixed by #631
Labels
enhancement New feature or request job-task

Comments

@n-sviridenko
Copy link
Contributor

n-sviridenko commented Nov 20, 2021

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

Like on Airtable, filters have to be applied on a table level rather than on a user level. I want to configure views in a way so that my team can benefit from the filters I set. I don't want 20 people configuring the same filters again and again.

P.S. I shared this feedback ~2 months ago over email, so you might already have an issue for that.

@n-sviridenko n-sviridenko changed the title Filters have to be shared Filters have to be common for all users Nov 20, 2021
@notsidney notsidney added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 23, 2021
@n-sviridenko
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey guys, any updates on this, or at least an approximate timeline? cc @shamsmosowi @notsidney

@notsidney
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @n-sviridenko, we’re investigating this as part of our current sprint, but cannot guarantee it will be part of the next release this month as v2.3

notsidney added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 13, 2022
@notsidney notsidney linked a pull request Feb 2, 2022 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request job-task
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants