Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

No explanation for files-duplicate #1076

Closed
madonuko opened this issue Jun 17, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #1127
Closed

No explanation for files-duplicate #1076

madonuko opened this issue Jun 17, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #1127

Comments

@madonuko
Copy link

madonuko commented Jun 17, 2023

$ rpmlint -e files-duplicate
files-duplicate:
Unknown message, please report a bug if the description should be present.

The warning is from:

============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.4.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 31, packages: 1

argagg-doc.aarch64: W: non-coherent-filename argagg-doc-0:0.4.7-1.fc38.aarch64.rpm argagg-doc-0.4.7-1.fc38.aarch64.rpm
argagg-doc.aarch64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog
argagg-doc.aarch64: E: no-binary
argagg-doc.aarch64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/doc/argagg/html/search/functions_0.js /usr/share/doc/argagg/html/search/all_0.js
argagg-doc.aarch64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/doc/argagg/html/search/functions_18.js /usr/share/doc/argagg/html/search/all_18.js
argagg-doc.aarch64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/doc/argagg/html/search/functions_1b.js /usr/share/doc/argagg/html/search/all_1b.js
 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5 warnings, 1 badness; has taken 0.2 s 
@danigm
Copy link
Member

danigm commented Jun 19, 2023

This error is added in DuplicatesCheck.py and the explanation should be added to the DuplicatesCheck.toml

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants