-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Inline stylesheets on load #909
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
22 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
42009f3
inline stylesheets when loaded
Juice10 b9ddfae
set empty link elements to loaded by default
Juice10 4c10804
Clean up stylesheet manager
Juice10 e9f8e06
Remove attribute mutation code
Juice10 c11e052
Update packages/rrweb/test/record.test.ts
Juice10 244a26a
Update packages/rrweb/test/record.test.ts
Juice10 1edb1ea
Update packages/rrweb/test/record.test.ts
Juice10 45bafbd
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/rrweb-io/rrweb into seria…
Juice10 401c503
Update packages/rrweb/scripts/repl.js
Juice10 2ec406b
Update packages/rrweb/test/record.test.ts
Juice10 2e8492e
Update packages/rrweb/src/record/index.ts
Juice10 217bd7c
Add todo
Juice10 c0371f0
Move require out of time sensitive assert
Juice10 fd38d43
Merge branch 'serialize-stylesheet-contents' of https://github.com/rr…
Juice10 dee14a6
Add waitForRAF, its more reliable than waitForTimeout
Juice10 1965152
Remove flaky tests
Juice10 8ff7bc6
Add recording stylesheets in iframes
Juice10 d5a83be
Remove variability from flaky test
Juice10 7e3a1a8
Make test more robust
Juice10 8c7a38f
Fix naming
Juice10 6878711
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/rrweb-io/rrweb into seria…
Juice10 71a0853
Merge branch 'master' into serialize-stylesheet-contents
Juice10 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Juice10 I think this whole
if
could have been false, if inlineStylesheet is false?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes that's very much possible. To be honest it's a while ago so I'm not sure if there was a deliberate intention to call this even if inlineStylesheet was false, but looking back at it I don't think so
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It seems like the only upshot of
serializeNodeWithId
here is to extract out the_cssText
from the .sheet (as this link element has already been serialized). Would it be fair to refactor based on that insight? I'll be doing some work with assets related to this.In the rrweb callback it checks for
._cssText
on the serialized node, but also maybe there was an intention to track future stylesheet modifications: