Demonstrates problem where a module can affect how `LetDefinition`s are put in the ancestor chain #908

alindeman · 2013-05-15T22:29:47Z

⚠️ For now this pull request has a failing test for demonstration.

This was originally filed as LetDefinitions needs to be defined on the nested instance rather than the definition of ExampleGroup rspec-rails#738, but we can
demonstrate it without rails or activesupport

…re put in the ancestor chain

JonRowe · 2013-05-16T23:09:29Z

Excellent, I struggled to reproduce this without Rails/AS

Demonstrates problem where a module can affect how LetDefinitions a…

78fd4cf

…re put in the ancestor chain

alindeman mentioned this pull request Jun 10, 2013

Refactor memoized helpers #937

Merged

JonRowe closed this in #937 Jun 10, 2013

This was referenced Jun 10, 2013

WIP: Fix let definitions eagerly included #941

Closed

Better fix for let definitions eagerly included #942

Merged

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Demonstrates problem where a module can affect how `LetDefinition`s are put in the ancestor chain #908

Demonstrates problem where a module can affect how `LetDefinition`s are put in the ancestor chain #908

alindeman commented May 15, 2013

JonRowe commented May 16, 2013

Demonstrates problem where a module can affect how LetDefinitions are put in the ancestor chain #908

Demonstrates problem where a module can affect how LetDefinitions are put in the ancestor chain #908

Conversation

alindeman commented May 15, 2013

JonRowe commented May 16, 2013

Demonstrates problem where a module can affect how `LetDefinition`s are put in the ancestor chain #908

Demonstrates problem where a module can affect how `LetDefinition`s are put in the ancestor chain #908