-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 104
Drop Ruby < 2.3 #435
Drop Ruby < 2.3 #435
Conversation
https://rubies.travis-ci.org/ claims they don't even have 9.1.7.0 jruby-head jruby-9.1.9.0 jruby-9.1.5.0 jruby-9.1.4.0 jruby-9.1.3.0 jruby-9.1.2.0 jruby-9.1.1.0 jruby-9.1.0.0 jruby-9.0.5.0 jruby-9.0.4.0 jruby-9.0.3.0 jruby-9.0.1.0 jruby-9.0.0.0 RVM has 9.2 now
We're always on Ruby 2.3+
We always test against 9.0+, 9.2 actually, and 9.2 is recommended for all users, there's no excuse to be using 9.0 or 9.1
Java::JavaLang::String.instance_method(:char_at).arity evaluates to 1 on JRuby 9.2(.13.0)
end | ||
end | ||
end | ||
# FIXME: if you remove this, `double`, `hide_const`, `stub_const` can't be found in specs |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🤯 🤷♂️
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Firstly, for some reason I can't push there to rc4.0 branch and the build fails when trying to check it out. Additionally, why is it needed?
Any PRs working up proposals for RSpec 4.0 need to be marked as draft as they will require very careful release management, they will not be merged to main for a long time. |
I've created a |
@JonRowe Sounds good, thanks! May I kindly ask you to grant me
|
I'll close this PR and will open another one with a more descriptive branch name ( |
@pirj just make sure to target |
Superseded by #436 |
Better viewed ignoring indentation changes https://github.com/rspec/rspec-support/pull/435/files?diff=split&w=1
As per rspec/rspec#61 (comment)
Minimal changes to
rspec-core
andrspec-mocks
were required to runrspec-support
's own spec suite, pushed to branches with the same name.What has been done
Done:
Discuss:
TODO:
for rspec-dev: