-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 274
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The b34i version cannot be fixed when using the bds system for moving base calculation #267
Comments
I am able to duplicate your issue. The solution fixes OK with integer ambiguity for Beidou disabled ( "Integer Ambiguity Res (BDS)"=OFF in Setting2 tab) but not with this enabled. I need to take a closer look to see if this is an issue with your Beidou receiver data or an issue with the RTKLIB code but in the meantime you should be fine with this option disabled. Beidou integer ambiguity resolution does work fine in RTKLIB in general with other receivers. By the way, you have L1/L2/L5 observations for both rover and base so you can set the Frequencies option to L1/L2/L5 for better results. |
ok!The bds system also fails to fix ambiguity when using full-system solutions in rtklib. |
I just realized from your screenshot that you are trying to solve for BDS only. Because RTKLIB was originally written for GPS only, in normal circumstances you should always have GPS selected for a RTK or PPK solution. Also, for PPK solutions, you will generally get a better solution with "Filter Type" set to combined rather than forward. RTKLIB does not not use wide-lane or extra wide-lane combinations for ambiguity resolution, only uncombined signals. |
Yes, I would like to confirm whether rtklib can be solved using only BDS system for RTK? |
Yes, in theory, you should be able to get an RTK solution with just BDS
satellites, but RTKLIB has some dependencies on the GPS satellites due to
its GPS-only origins, so you do need to include them.
…On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 6:49 PM joseph-chunhui ***@***.***> wrote:
Yes, I would like to confirm whether rtklib can be solved using only BDS
system for RTK?
Logically, as long as the signal supports, the RTK solution using only the
BDS system and the RTK solution using only the GPS system should have the
same result.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#267 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AC3YLOWFYXCBYEWKJ2UWNHLZCP7DNAVCNFSM6AAAAABHRQ6EJ6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCMJTG4YDSMZRGM>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
But in fact, I use GPS+BDS at the same time, the BDS satellite can not fix the integer ambiguity, only GPS satellite can fix the integer ambiguity, what is the reason? |
The following is the solution related configuration and solution result. It is obvious that the solution result has failed.
In the data, the base station signal undergoes occlusion once every period of time and then recovers to a good signal.
bds.zip
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: