Register offenses for variables against regexes in Performance/StringInclude
#332
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See rails/rails#46910.
The second pattern of
StringInclude#redundant_regex?
((send (regexp (str $#literal?) (regopt)) {:match :match?} $str)
) is pretty useless, because it only detects cases like'str'.match?(/str/)
, so literal regex is matched against literal string. But does anyone write such code?That pattern was implemented that way, because, to avoid cases when the receiver is a symbol and symbol does not implement
#include?
. But, it already marks as offense and autocorrectscan_be_a_symbol.match?(/abc/)
! So I think this PR changes are fair.