Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 14, 2021. It is now read-only.

[Resolver] Consider locked dependencies first #5101

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 15, 2017

Conversation

segiddins
Copy link
Member

@segiddins segiddins commented Oct 19, 2016

Closes #5031
Closes #5095

\c @marcandre @indirect

@indirect
Copy link
Member

This seems reasonable, is there an easy way to test this out?

@segiddins
Copy link
Member Author

@indirect I used the bundle in the linked issue. I also should probably run this against the benchmarks

@indirect
Copy link
Member

My past experience has been that any change to the resolver will regress unless there is a test for it... worst case, put that gemfile into the realworld specs, but we need something for sure.

@segiddins
Copy link
Member Author

I don't know for sure how to test this, other than coming up with a reasonable reproduction case

@segiddins segiddins force-pushed the seg-resolver-consider-locked-deps-first branch from ffa167b to fa8ebce Compare November 30, 2016 16:01
@segiddins segiddins force-pushed the seg-resolver-consider-locked-deps-first branch from fa8ebce to 1d0f11b Compare January 15, 2017 01:18
@segiddins
Copy link
Member Author

Realworld spec added

@indirect
Copy link
Member

@bundlerbot r+

@bundlerbot
Copy link
Collaborator

📌 Commit 6030a00 has been approved by indirect

@bundlerbot
Copy link
Collaborator

⌛ Testing commit 6030a00 with merge d7bafcc...

bundlerbot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 15, 2017
…, r=indirect

[Resolver] Consider locked dependencies first

Closes #5031
Closes #5095

\c @marcandre @indirect
@bundlerbot
Copy link
Collaborator

☀️ Test successful - status-travis
Approved by: indirect
Pushing d7bafcc to master...

@bundlerbot bundlerbot merged commit 6030a00 into master Jan 15, 2017
@segiddins segiddins deleted the seg-resolver-consider-locked-deps-first branch January 15, 2017 18:30
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants