This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 14, 2021. It is now read-only.
Avoid fetching an rebuilding git gems when it's not necessary #6711
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Kind of a followup to #4272
The issue
As demonstrated by the updated test case, whenever a gem is changed (even a non-git one), bundler re-fetch all git gems, and recompile their extensions (if any).
You can repro that issue by running the modified
git_spec.rb
against master.The proposed fix
In that patch I simply make
Source::Git
skip thefetch
step if thecached_revision
matches the install path.Since
install_path
uses only the first 10 characters of the full revision, there is a very very small chance of a collision happening, but It's so small that I think it can be ignored.However my understanding of the codebase is too limited to be 100% sure the git gem would be properly updated if it's definition (
branch
/ref
/etc
) is updated. I tried to write a test case for this but couldn't figure out how to create a repo with multiple revisions. I'll keep digging, but I figured I might as well ask for feedback at this stage.@segiddins any thoughts on this ? (since you fixed #4272), any pointers on how to better test this?
cc @rafaelfranca @jules2689