Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Make suggest next questions configurable #275

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Sep 9, 2024

Conversation

leehuwuj
Copy link
Collaborator

@leehuwuj leehuwuj commented Sep 6, 2024

Fix: #244

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a configuration for managing the "next questions" feature, enhancing flexibility in user interactions.
    • Added functionality to suggest follow-up questions based on conversation history, improving user engagement.
    • Implemented a service for processing and storing private files, facilitating efficient data management.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved response generation logic to conditionally yield suggested questions based on user settings.
  • Documentation

    • Updated project dependencies to include pydantic-settings for enhanced configuration management.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Sep 6, 2024

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 06a201e

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Name Type
create-llama Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 6, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce an environment configuration for managing the "next questions" functionality, enhance the handling of environment variables in the getTemplateEnvs function, and implement a PrivateFileService class for file processing. Additionally, new logic for suggesting follow-up questions based on conversation history is added, along with updates to dependencies for improved settings management.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.changeset/cyan-buttons-clean.md, helpers/env-variables.ts Introduced environment configuration for "next questions" and modified getTemplateEnvs to support both "multiagent" and "streaming" templates.
helpers/python.ts Added logic in installPythonTemplate to handle "streaming" and "multiagent" templates by copying relevant service files.
templates/components/services/python/file.py Implemented PrivateFileService class for processing and storing files, including methods for handling base64-encoded content and integrating with an indexing system.
templates/components/services/python/suggestion.py Created functionality for suggesting next questions based on conversation history, including settings and processing logic.
templates/types/multiagent/fastapi/app/api/routers/vercel_response.py Enhanced content_generator to suggest follow-up questions based on conversation context.
templates/types/multiagent/fastapi/pyproject.toml Added pydantic-settings dependency for improved configuration management.
templates/types/streaming/fastapi/app/api/routers/vercel_response.py Modified _chat_response_generator to conditionally generate suggested questions based on settings.
templates/types/streaming/fastapi/pyproject.toml Repositioned llama-index dependency and added pydantic-settings for better dependency management.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Pydantic Issue when running Ollama + FastAPI backend (#244)

🐰 In fields of green, I hop with glee,
New questions bloom, as bright as can be!
With settings in place, and files that align,
My code dances sweetly, oh how it does shine!
So let’s celebrate, with a joyful cheer,
For every new change brings us closer, my dear! 🌼✨

Tip

New features

Walkthrough comment now includes:

  • Possibly related PRs: A list of potentially related PRs to help you recall past context.
  • Suggested labels: CodeRabbit can now suggest labels by learning from your past PRs. You can also provide custom labeling instructions in the UI or configuration file.

Notes:

  • Please share any feedback in the discussion post on our Discord.
  • Possibly related PRs, automatic label suggestions based on past PRs, learnings, and possibly related issues require data opt-in (enabled by default).

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 6

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
helpers/env-variables.ts (1)

490-511: Missing Usage of NEXT_QUESTION_ENABLE

The NEXT_QUESTION_ENABLE environment variable is defined but not used in the codebase. This variable is intended to control the display of next question suggestions, but without any implementation, it cannot serve its purpose.

  • Ensure that NEXT_QUESTION_ENABLE is checked in the relevant parts of the application where next question suggestions are generated or displayed. This might involve adding conditional logic to enable or disable the feature based on the variable's value.
Analysis chain

Review: Enhanced Configuration for Next Question Suggestions

The changes introduced in the getTemplateEnvs function are significant as they aim to address the issue outlined in PR #275 and linked issue #244. The addition of the nextQuestionEnvs array with environment variables NEXT_QUESTION_ENABLE and NEXT_QUESTION_PROMPT is a strategic enhancement to make the next question suggestion feature configurable.

Observations:

  • The implementation uses a straightforward approach to add these environment variables if the template is either "multiagent" or "streaming".
  • The default prompt provided in NEXT_QUESTION_PROMPT is detailed and seems to align well with the intended functionality of suggesting follow-up questions based on conversation history.

Suggestions:

  • Ensure that the default values and descriptions are clear and informative for end-users or developers who will configure these settings.
  • Consider adding validation or error handling to check the integrity of the template parameter to ensure it only allows valid values that the system expects.
  • It might be beneficial to add a unit test to verify that the correct environment variables are returned based on different template inputs.

Overall:
The changes are aligned with the PR objectives and should provide the necessary functionality to control the next question suggestion feature dynamically. This should help in resolving the validation error encountered as described in the linked issue.

It would be prudent to verify that these new environment variables are being correctly utilized in the parts of the application that generate the next questions. This can ensure that the integration is seamless and functional.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of NEXT_QUESTION_ENABLE and NEXT_QUESTION_PROMPT in the application.

# Test: Search for the usage of the new environment variables. Expect: Proper handling and usage in the code.
rg --type ts -A 5 $'NEXT_QUESTION_ENABLE|NEXT_QUESTION_PROMPT'

Length of output: 2336


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of NEXT_QUESTION_ENABLE in the application.

# Test: Search for the usage of the NEXT_QUESTION_ENABLE environment variable. Expect: Proper handling and usage in the code.
rg --type ts -A 5 'NEXT_QUESTION_ENABLE'

Length of output: 360

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c16deed and 2221b50.

Files selected for processing (9)
  • .changeset/cyan-buttons-clean.md (1 hunks)
  • helpers/env-variables.ts (1 hunks)
  • helpers/python.ts (1 hunks)
  • templates/components/services/python/file.py (1 hunks)
  • templates/components/services/python/suggestion.py (1 hunks)
  • templates/types/multiagent/fastapi/app/api/routers/vercel_response.py (2 hunks)
  • templates/types/multiagent/fastapi/pyproject.toml (1 hunks)
  • templates/types/streaming/fastapi/app/api/routers/vercel_response.py (2 hunks)
  • templates/types/streaming/fastapi/pyproject.toml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • .changeset/cyan-buttons-clean.md
  • templates/types/streaming/fastapi/pyproject.toml
Additional comments not posted (4)
templates/types/multiagent/fastapi/pyproject.toml (1)

19-19: Dependency Addition Approved: pydantic-settings

The addition of pydantic-settings with the version constraint ^2.4.0 is appropriate. This will help in managing application settings more robustly using Pydantic's features.

templates/components/services/python/suggestion.py (2)

14-28: Class Implementation Approved: NextQuestionSettings

The implementation of NextQuestionSettings is robust, utilizing Pydantic's BaseSettings for environment-based configuration. The default values and the prompt property method are correctly implemented.


33-37: Class Implementation Approved: NextQuestions

The NextQuestions class is correctly implemented as a simple data model using Pydantic's BaseModel. It appropriately defines a list of strings to store the next questions.

templates/types/multiagent/fastapi/app/api/routers/vercel_response.py (1)

10-12: Review of imports and new dependencies

The imports at lines 10 and 12 introduce dependencies on Message from app.api.routers.models and NextQuestionSuggestion from app.api.services.suggestion. These are crucial for the new functionality related to generating next questions based on conversation history. Ensure that these modules are properly documented and tested, especially since they play a significant role in the new feature.

templates/components/services/python/suggestion.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
templates/components/services/python/file.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
templates/components/services/python/file.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
helpers/python.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2221b50 and a82424a.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • templates/types/multiagent/fastapi/app/api/routers/vercel_response.py (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • templates/types/multiagent/fastapi/app/api/routers/vercel_response.py

helpers/env-variables.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
helpers/env-variables.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
templates/components/services/python/file.py Show resolved Hide resolved
templates/components/services/python/suggestion.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
templates/components/services/python/suggestion.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
templates/components/services/python/suggestion.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (3)
templates/components/services/python/suggestion.py (2)

21-23: Class method conversion approved.

The conversion of get_configured_prompt to a class method is appropriate as it aligns with its usage pattern. It correctly fetches the environment variable for the next question prompt.

Consider adding a default value for the environment variable to ensure that there is a fallback prompt if none is configured.


Line range hint 25-60: Enhanced robustness in suggest_next_questions.

The updates to suggest_next_questions improve its robustness by handling cases where the prompt is not configured and by returning None in error scenarios. The use of the last two messages to generate questions is a good optimization.

Consider enhancing error handling by possibly retrying the operation or providing more detailed error information to the caller.

templates/types/streaming/fastapi/app/api/routers/vercel_response.py (1)

59-73: Conditional generation of next questions approved.

The modifications to _chat_response_generator to conditionally generate next questions based on the configuration of NextQuestionSuggestion are well-implemented. This optimizes performance and enhances user experience by not unnecessarily attempting to generate questions.

Consider adding a comment before the conditional block to explain why the check for the configured prompt is necessary. This can improve code readability and maintainability.

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a82424a and a9ff7d0.

Files selected for processing (4)
  • helpers/env-variables.ts (2 hunks)
  • templates/components/services/python/suggestion.py (3 hunks)
  • templates/types/multiagent/fastapi/app/api/routers/vercel_response.py (2 hunks)
  • templates/types/streaming/fastapi/app/api/routers/vercel_response.py (1 hunks)

Comment on lines 489 to 511
const getTemplateEnvs = (
template?: TemplateType,
framework?: TemplateFramework,
): EnvVar[] => {
const nextQuestionEnvs: EnvVar[] = [
{
name: "NEXT_QUESTION_PROMPT",
description: `Customize prompt to generate the next question suggestions based on the conversation history.
Disable this prompt to disable the next question suggestions feature.`,
value: `"You're a helpful assistant! Your task is to suggest the next question that user might ask.
Here is the conversation history
---------------------\n{conversation}\n---------------------
Given the conversation history, please give me 3 questions that you might ask next!"`,
},
];

if (
framework === "fastapi" &&
(template === "multiagent" || template === "streaming")
) {
return nextQuestionEnvs;
}
return [];
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review of getTemplateEnvs function modifications

The modifications to the getTemplateEnvs function introduce a new environment variable NEXT_QUESTION_PROMPT and extend the function's capability to handle different templates. Here are some observations and suggestions:

  1. Correctness: The function correctly checks for the framework and template conditions before returning the nextQuestionEnvs. This ensures that the environment variables are only added when necessary, which is good for avoiding unnecessary configuration in other scenarios.

  2. Maintainability: The function is straightforward and maintains readability with clear condition checks and structured environment variable definitions. However, consider adding more comments explaining why only "multiagent" and "streaming" templates are considered here.

  3. Performance: There are no performance concerns with the current implementation as the operations are primarily conditional checks and array manipulations.

  4. Best Practices: The use of template literals and structured data for environment variables is a good practice. It keeps the code clean and easy to understand.

  5. Potential Improvements:

    • Extensibility: If more templates or conditions are expected in the future, consider refactoring this into a more scalable solution, such as using a mapping object or a switch-case structure to handle different templates.
    • Error Handling: Currently, the function does not handle potential errors or unexpected values for template or framework. Adding error logging or warnings for unexpected values could improve robustness.

Overall, the changes align well with the PR objectives and improve the configurability of the next questions feature.

Consider the following refactor for future extensibility and error handling:

// Potential refactor for handling multiple templates with error logging
const TEMPLATE_ENV_CONFIGS = {
  multiagent: nextQuestionEnvs,
  streaming: nextQuestionEnvs,
  // Add more templates as needed
};

function getTemplateEnvs(template?: TemplateType, framework?: TemplateFramework): EnvVar[] {
  if (framework === "fastapi" && TEMPLATE_ENV_CONFIGS[template]) {
    return TEMPLATE_ENV_CONFIGS[template];
  } else {
    console.warn(`Unsupported template or framework: ${template}, ${framework}`);
    return [];
  }
}

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a9ff7d0 and 0d7077e.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • helpers/env-variables.ts (1 hunks)
  • templates/components/services/python/suggestion.py (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
templates/components/services/python/suggestion.py (3)

13-18: Class Documentation and Structure Approved

The class NextQuestionSuggestion is well-documented and structured. The explanation of how to disable the feature is clear and helpful.


19-24: Method Implementation Approved

The method get_configured_prompt correctly retrieves and uses the environment variable. The handling of the absence of the variable by returning None is appropriate.


62-66: Verify Output Format and Consider More Robust Parsing

The method _extract_questions uses regex to parse the output, which assumes a specific format. Verify that this format is consistently provided by the LLM. Consider implementing a more robust parsing mechanism to handle potential variations in the output format.

helpers/env-variables.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
templates/components/llamaindex/typescript/streaming/suggestion.ts (1)

Line range hint 17-28: Error Handling: Improve error logging detail.

While the error handling mechanism catches exceptions and logs them, consider enhancing the log message to include more context about the error, such as the input prompt or conversation history, to aid in debugging.

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0d7077e and 1c91107.

Files selected for processing (4)
  • helpers/env-variables.ts (1 hunks)
  • templates/components/llamaindex/typescript/streaming/suggestion.ts (1 hunks)
  • templates/components/services/python/suggestion.py (1 hunks)
  • templates/types/streaming/fastapi/pyproject.toml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • helpers/env-variables.ts
  • templates/types/streaming/fastapi/pyproject.toml
Additional comments not posted (3)
templates/components/llamaindex/typescript/streaming/suggestion.ts (1)

14-17: Code Quality: Simplify prompt replacement logic.

The logic to replace the $conversation placeholder in the prompt is straightforward and effective. This change maintains readability and reduces complexity in constructing the prompt.

templates/components/services/python/suggestion.py (2)

13-24: Class Implementation: Well-structured and configurable.

The NextQuestionSuggestion class is well-structured and makes effective use of environment variables for configuration. Ensure that the environment variable NEXT_QUESTION_PROMPT is documented and validated during application startup to prevent runtime issues.


62-66: Method Implementation: Efficient text parsing with regex.

The method _extract_questions uses regex to efficiently parse the output text. Ensure that the regex pattern is thoroughly tested to handle various edge cases in the LLM output.

@marcusschiesser marcusschiesser force-pushed the lee/fix-suggest-questions branch from 259daba to 37fd59d Compare September 9, 2024 05:47
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Caution

Inline review comments failed to post

Actionable comments posted: 2

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1c91107 and 259daba.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • templates/types/multiagent/fastapi/app/api/routers/vercel_response.py (3 hunks)
  • templates/types/multiagent/fastapi/app/api/services/suggestion.py (2 hunks)
  • templates/types/streaming/fastapi/app/api/routers/vercel_response.py (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • templates/types/streaming/fastapi/app/api/routers/vercel_response.py
Additional comments not posted (2)
templates/types/multiagent/fastapi/app/api/services/suggestion.py (1)

Line range hint 29-61: Approve method changes but verify integration.

The refactoring of suggest_next_questions_all_messages to handle all messages is approved. The method efficiently constructs the conversation history and handles errors appropriately.

However, ensure that the integration with external settings (Settings.llm.astructured_predict) and the prompt template (NEXT_QUESTIONS_SUGGESTION_PROMPT) is correctly configured and tested.

Run the following script to verify the integration with external dependencies:

Verification successful

Integration with External Dependencies Verified

The integration of Settings.llm.astructured_predict and NEXT_QUESTIONS_SUGGESTION_PROMPT in the suggest_next_questions_all_messages method is correctly configured and used. The prompt template is well-defined, and the method call includes the necessary arguments. No issues were found with the integration.

  • Settings.llm.astructured_predict is used with the correct prompt and arguments.
  • NEXT_QUESTIONS_SUGGESTION_PROMPT is defined as a PromptTemplate with appropriate placeholders.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the integration with external settings and prompt templates.

# Test: Search for the usage of `Settings.llm.astructured_predict` and `NEXT_QUESTIONS_SUGGESTION_PROMPT`. Expect: Correct configuration and usage.
rg --type python -A 5 $'Settings.llm.astructured_predict'
rg --type python -A 5 $'NEXT_QUESTIONS_SUGGESTION_PROMPT'

Length of output: 175


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the integration with external settings and prompt templates using corrected rg syntax.

# Test: Search for the usage of `Settings.llm.astructured_predict` and `NEXT_QUESTIONS_SUGGESTION_PROMPT`. Expect: Correct configuration and usage.
rg --type py -A 5 $'Settings.llm.astructured_predict'
rg --type py -A 5 $'NEXT_QUESTIONS_SUGGESTION_PROMPT'

Length of output: 2153

templates/types/multiagent/fastapi/app/api/routers/vercel_response.py (1)

104-109: Approve method modification.

The change to make _event_to_response a static method is approved. The method correctly handles the construction of the response dictionary, ensuring consistent and reusable event handling.

Comments failed to post (2)
templates/types/multiagent/fastapi/app/api/services/suggestion.py (1)

62-74: Approve new method with a suggestion for unit tests.

The addition of suggest_next_questions is approved. The method effectively reuses existing functionality and handles the input parameters correctly.

Consider adding unit tests to cover scenarios where the chat history and responses vary to ensure robustness and correctness of the suggestions generated.

Would you like me to help with implementing the unit tests or to create a GitHub issue for this task?

templates/types/multiagent/fastapi/app/api/routers/vercel_response.py (1)

111-121: Approve new method with a suggestion for error handling.

The addition of _generate_next_questions is approved. The method correctly uses the new suggest_next_questions method to generate follow-up questions based on the chat history and response.

Consider adding error handling to manage potential exceptions from the suggest_next_questions call, ensuring that the application remains robust in case of errors.

Would you like me to help with implementing the error handling or to create a GitHub issue for this task?

@marcusschiesser marcusschiesser force-pushed the lee/fix-suggest-questions branch from 37fd59d to 9b788f4 Compare September 9, 2024 05:48
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 259daba and 9b788f4.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • templates/components/services/python/suggestion.py (1 hunks)
  • templates/types/multiagent/fastapi/app/api/routers/vercel_response.py (3 hunks)
  • templates/types/streaming/fastapi/app/api/routers/vercel_response.py (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • templates/components/services/python/suggestion.py
  • templates/types/streaming/fastapi/app/api/routers/vercel_response.py
Additional comments not posted (3)
templates/types/multiagent/fastapi/app/api/routers/vercel_response.py (3)

60-77: Enhanced response generation with next question suggestion

The modifications in the content_generator method from lines 60 to 77 introduce logic to handle responses differently based on the type of result (AgentRunResult or AsyncGenerator). The addition of generating next questions based on the conversation history is a significant enhancement.

  • Correctness: The use of final_response to accumulate responses and the conditional check for next_question_settings.enable are correctly implemented. However, ensure that next_question_settings is robustly defined and fails gracefully if not properly configured.
  • Performance: Consider the implications of string concatenation in Python, which can be inefficient for large strings. Using a list to collect strings and joining them at the end might be more efficient.
  • Error Handling: The method should handle potential exceptions from NextQuestionSuggestion.suggest_next_questions gracefully, possibly with a try-except block.
  • Maintainability: The method is relatively clear, but adding more inline comments explaining why certain decisions were made (e.g., why messages are appended in a certain way) would improve maintainability.

Consider adding unit tests specifically for this method to cover various scenarios, including edge cases where result might not fit expected types.

Would you like me to help with implementing the suggested improvements or to create a GitHub issue for adding unit tests?


104-121: Addition of _generate_next_questions method

The new method _generate_next_questions introduced in lines 111 to 121 is crucial for generating follow-up questions based on the conversation history. This method is well-implemented with clear asynchronous handling and proper use of the NextQuestionSuggestion service.

  • Correctness: The method correctly checks if questions are available and returns a structured response if so. The return of None when no questions are available is also handled appropriately.
  • Performance: The method is efficient in its current form, but consider caching results if the generation of questions is computationally expensive.
  • Error Handling: Ensure that the NextQuestionSuggestion.suggest_next_questions call is robust against failures. Consider adding a try-except block to handle potential exceptions gracefully.
  • Maintainability: The method is concise and clear. Adding a few comments describing the expected format of questions might enhance understanding for future maintainers.

Overall, this method is a valuable addition to the application, enhancing its interactivity by providing relevant follow-up questions.


104-109: Refactor of _event_to_response to static method

The change from a regular method to a static method in _event_to_response from lines 104 to 109 is a good practice as it does not depend on the instance state. This makes the method more modular and easier to test.

  • Correctness: The method correctly formats the response based on the event data.
  • Maintainability: This change improves the maintainability by making the method more self-contained and easier to reuse in different contexts.

This refactor is approved as it aligns with best practices in software development.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9b788f4 and 06a201e.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • helpers/env-variables.ts (1 hunks)
  • templates/components/llamaindex/typescript/streaming/suggestion.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • templates/components/llamaindex/typescript/streaming/suggestion.ts
Additional comments not posted (1)
helpers/env-variables.ts (1)

513-513: Verify Error Handling in File Operations

The createBackendEnvFile function performs file operations which can potentially fail. Ensure that there are adequate error handling mechanisms in place to catch and log file system errors. This is crucial for debugging and maintaining the robustness of the application.

Consider wrapping the file operation in a try-catch block and logging any errors that occur:

try {
  await fs.writeFile(path.join(root, envFileName), content);
  console.log(`Created '${envFileName}' file. Please check the settings.`);
} catch (error) {
  console.error(`Failed to write environment file: ${error}`);
}

helpers/env-variables.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
@marcusschiesser marcusschiesser merged commit 8105c5c into main Sep 9, 2024
37 checks passed
@marcusschiesser marcusschiesser deleted the lee/fix-suggest-questions branch September 9, 2024 07:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Pydantic Issue when running Ollama + FastAPI backend
2 participants