feat: use selected llamacloud for multiagent #359
Conversation
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: e3d28dd The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
WalkthroughA new patch named "create-llama" has been introduced to enhance the multiagent functionality by utilizing a specific "llamacloud" configuration. This update includes several modifications to improve type safety and flexibility in the system. Key changes involve updating various functions to accept optional parameters, allowing for more dynamic interactions and configurations within the multiagent framework. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
.changeset/stupid-paws-push.md (1)
1-5: LGTM! Consider enhancing the description.The changeset file is correctly formatted and appropriately describes a patch-level change. The use of a patch version for this feature addition is suitable.
To improve clarity, consider expanding the description slightly. For example:
- feat: use selected llamacloud for multiagent + feat: enhance multiagent functionality by utilizing selected llamacloud configurationThis provides more context about the nature and impact of the change.
templates/components/multiagent/typescript/workflow/tools.ts (2)
Line range hint
42-42: Consider passing parameters togetQueryEngineToolingetAvailableTools.The
getQueryEngineToolfunction now accepts an optional parameter, but it's called without any arguments ingetAvailableTools. While this is valid due to the parameter being optional, you might be missing an opportunity to leverage the new flexibility.Consider if there are any relevant parameters that could be passed to
getQueryEngineToolhere to enhance its functionality. If there are, update the call accordingly.
Line range hint
7-42: Summary of changes and potential impactThe modifications to
getQueryEngineToolappear to be part of a larger effort to increase the flexibility of the multiagent system. While the changes are localized to this function, they may have broader implications:
- The function is now exported, potentially increasing its usage across the codebase.
- The new optional
paramsargument allows for more dynamic configuration, but its usage and impact need to be carefully considered.To ensure these changes align with the overall system architecture:
- Review the usage of
getQueryEngineToolacross the entire codebase to ensure compatibility with the new signature.- Consider documenting the expected structure and usage of the
paramsargument to guide future developers.- Evaluate if similar flexibility should be added to other related functions for consistency.
These changes enhance the system's adaptability, but careful consideration of their broader impact is crucial for maintaining system integrity and consistency.
templates/components/multiagent/typescript/express/chat.controller.ts (1)
10-10: LGTM! Consider using a more specific type fordata.The addition of the optional
dataparameter increases the flexibility of the function, which aligns with the PR objective. However, usinganytype might reduce type safety.Consider defining a more specific type for
dataif its structure is known, or useunknowninstead ofanyfor better type safety. For example:const { messages, data }: { messages: Message[]; data?: Record<string, unknown> } = req.body;templates/components/multiagent/typescript/workflow/agents.ts (2)
5-8: Consider using a more specific type forparams.While adding an optional
paramsparameter increases flexibility, using theanytype may lead to type safety issues. Consider defining a specific interface or type forparamsto improve type safety and code maintainability.For example:
interface QueryEngineParams { // Add specific properties here } export const createResearcher = async ( chatHistory: ChatMessage[], params?: QueryEngineParams ) => { // ... }
9-16: LGTM: Dynamic tool inclusion implemented correctly.The changes allow for dynamic inclusion of the
queryEngineToolbased on the provided parameters, which enhances the flexibility of thecreateResearcherfunction.Consider adding error handling for the
getQueryEngineToolcall to improve robustness:let queryEngineTool; try { queryEngineTool = await getQueryEngineTool(params); } catch (error) { console.error("Error getting query engine tool:", error); // Decide how to handle the error (e.g., set queryEngineTool to null or throw) }templates/components/multiagent/typescript/workflow/factory.ts (1)
76-76: Consider using a more specific type forparams.The addition of the optional
paramsparameter allows for more flexible configuration during workflow creation, which is good. However, usinganyas the type forparamsmight be too permissive and could lead to potential type-related issues in the future.Consider defining a specific interface or type for
paramsto improve type safety and documentation. For example:interface WorkflowParams { // Add specific properties here llamacloud?: string; // ... other configuration options } export const createWorkflow = (chatHistory: ChatMessage[], params?: WorkflowParams) => { // ... function body }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
- .changeset/stupid-paws-push.md (1 hunks)
- templates/components/multiagent/typescript/express/chat.controller.ts (2 hunks)
- templates/components/multiagent/typescript/nextjs/route.ts (2 hunks)
- templates/components/multiagent/typescript/workflow/agents.ts (1 hunks)
- templates/components/multiagent/typescript/workflow/factory.ts (3 hunks)
- templates/components/multiagent/typescript/workflow/tools.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (5)
templates/components/multiagent/typescript/express/chat.controller.ts (1)
Pattern
templates/**: For files under thetemplatesfolder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.templates/components/multiagent/typescript/nextjs/route.ts (1)
Pattern
templates/**: For files under thetemplatesfolder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.templates/components/multiagent/typescript/workflow/agents.ts (1)
Pattern
templates/**: For files under thetemplatesfolder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.templates/components/multiagent/typescript/workflow/factory.ts (1)
Pattern
templates/**: For files under thetemplatesfolder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.templates/components/multiagent/typescript/workflow/tools.ts (1)
Pattern
templates/**: For files under thetemplatesfolder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.
🔇 Additional comments (8)
templates/components/multiagent/typescript/express/chat.controller.ts (2)
Line range hint
1-41: Overall, the changes look good and align with the PR objectives.The modifications to the
chatfunction effectively implement the feature of using a selected llamacloud for multiagent by allowing additional data to be passed to the workflow creation process. The changes are consistent and well-implemented.A few suggestions were made to improve type safety and ensure proper implementation of dependent functions. Please consider these suggestions and verify the
createWorkflowfunction implementation as mentioned earlier.
20-20: LGTM! VerifycreateWorkflowimplementation.The
dataparameter is correctly passed to thecreateWorkflowfunction, which is consistent with the changes in the function signature.Please ensure that the
createWorkflowfunction in theworkflow/factory.tsfile has been updated to handle the newdataparameter correctly. Run the following script to verify:✅ Verification successful
Verified
createWorkflowimplementation handles thedataparameter correctly.The
createWorkflowfunction inworkflow/factory.tsaccepts two parameters, aligning with the changes inchat.controller.ts.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of createWorkflow function # Test: Check if createWorkflow function accepts two parameters ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'function createWorkflow($_: $_[], $_?: $_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 93
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of createWorkflow function with two required parameters # Test: Check if createWorkflow function accepts two required parameters ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'function createWorkflow($_: $_[], $_: $_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 92
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of createWorkflow function as an arrow function with two parameters # Test: Check if createWorkflow is defined as an arrow function accepting two parameters ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'const createWorkflow = ($_: $_[], $_?: $_) => { $$$ }'Length of output: 16860
templates/components/multiagent/typescript/nextjs/route.ts (2)
32-32: LGTM: Consistent update tocreateWorkflowfunction call.The
createWorkflowfunction call has been correctly updated to include the newdataparameter, maintaining consistency with the changes in the request body structure.
Line range hint
19-32: Consider adding logic to handle the newdatainput.The
dataparameter has been added to the request body and passed tocreateWorkflow, but there's no visible logic within this function to process or utilize this new input. Ensure that thedatais being used appropriately within the workflow creation and execution process.To verify the usage of
data, you can run the following script:This script will help identify how
datais being used in the workflow creation process and related files.templates/components/multiagent/typescript/workflow/agents.ts (2)
3-3: LGTM: Import statement updated correctly.The import statement has been updated to include
getQueryEngineTool, which is consistent with its usage in thecreateResearcherfunction.
Line range hint
1-24: Overall: Good changes with minor suggestions for improvement.The modifications to the
createResearcherfunction enhance its flexibility by allowing dynamic tool inclusion based on provided parameters. The implementation is correct and aligns with the intended functionality.Summary of suggestions:
- Consider using a more specific type for the
paramsparameter instead ofany.- Add error handling for the
getQueryEngineToolcall to improve robustness.These improvements will further enhance type safety and error handling in the code.
templates/components/multiagent/typescript/workflow/factory.ts (2)
38-47: LGTM! Typing issues addressed.The changes in the
prepareChatHistoryfunction successfully address the typing issues mentioned in the previous review. The added type guard ensures that only valid annotation objects are processed, enhancing type safety and robustness of the function.
135-138: VerifycreateResearcherfunction signature.The modification to pass the
paramsargument tocreateResearcherallows for more flexible researcher creation, which is good. This change aligns with the updatedcreateWorkflowfunction signature.Please ensure that the
createResearcherfunction is updated to accept theparamsargument. You can verify this by running the following script:If the
createResearcherfunction is not updated, consider modifying its signature to accept theparamsargument:const createResearcher = (chatHistory: ChatMessage[], params?: WorkflowParams) => { // ... function body }
templates/components/multiagent/typescript/workflow/single-agent.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
templates/components/multiagent/typescript/workflow/factory.ts (2)
Line range hint
30-62: Address type inconsistencies between 'Message' and 'ChatMessage'The function
prepareChatHistorynow acceptschatHistory: Message[]and returnsChatMessage[]. Casting the result usingas ChatMessage[]may conceal potential type mismatches betweenMessagefrom"ai"andChatMessagefrom"llamaindex". To maintain type safety, consider explicitly mapping eachMessageto aChatMessage.
65-65: Define a specific type for the 'params' parameterThe
paramsparameter increateWorkflowis currently typed asany. Specifying a concrete type or interface forparamswill enhance type safety and improve code readability.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- templates/components/llamaindex/typescript/streaming/annotations.ts (1 hunks)
- templates/components/multiagent/typescript/express/chat.controller.ts (2 hunks)
- templates/components/multiagent/typescript/nextjs/route.ts (3 hunks)
- templates/components/multiagent/typescript/workflow/factory.ts (4 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- templates/components/multiagent/typescript/express/chat.controller.ts
- templates/components/multiagent/typescript/nextjs/route.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
templates/components/llamaindex/typescript/streaming/annotations.ts (1)
Pattern
templates/**: For files under thetemplatesfolder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.templates/components/multiagent/typescript/workflow/factory.ts (1)
Pattern
templates/**: For files under thetemplatesfolder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.
🔇 Additional comments (1)
templates/components/llamaindex/typescript/streaming/annotations.ts (1)
175-197: Well-implementedgetAnnotationsfunction enhances flexibility.The new
getAnnotationsfunction is correctly implemented, follows best practices, and improves code reusability by providing a generic way to retrieve annotations based on specified criteria.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
templates/components/multiagent/typescript/workflow/single-agent.ts (3)
Line range hint
30-39: LGTM! Consider adding JSDoc comments for the new parameters.The addition of
verboseandtimeoutparameters enhances the flexibility of theFunctionCallingAgentclass. The default timeout of 360 seconds is reasonable for most use cases.Consider adding JSDoc comments for the new parameters to improve code documentation:
/** * @param options.verbose - Whether to enable verbose logging * @param options.timeout - Timeout in seconds for the agent's operations (default: 360) */
146-154: Improved streaming and tool call handling. Consider adding error handling for edge cases.The refactoring of
handleLLMInputStreamsignificantly improves the handling of streaming responses and tool calls. The new implementation correctly addresses the issues mentioned in the past review comments.Consider adding error handling for the edge case where the generator might not yield anything if there's no full response:
if (!fullResponse) { throw new Error("No response received from LLM"); } if (fullResponse?.options && Object.keys(fullResponse.options).length) { // ... existing code ... } else { memory.put({ role: "assistant", content: fullResponse?.delta || "", }); return; // Explicitly mark generator as done }
Line range hint
181-195: Improved error handling for tool calls. Consider adding more detailed error logging.The changes in
handleToolCallsenhance error handling and logging for tool calls. Usingconsole.erroris appropriate for logging errors.Consider adding more detailed error logging to help with debugging:
const toolOutput = await callTool(targetTool, call, { log: () => {}, error: (err) => console.error(`Error in tool ${call.name}:`, err), warn: console.warn.bind(console), });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- templates/components/multiagent/typescript/workflow/single-agent.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
templates/components/multiagent/typescript/workflow/single-agent.ts (1)
Pattern
templates/**: For files under thetemplatesfolder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.
marcusschiesser
deleted the
feat/use-selected-llamacloud-index-in-multi-agent-ts
branch
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
FunctionCallingAgentwith additional optional parameters for improved configuration.Bug Fixes