Support converting Ceil and Exists conditions to Bool unsafely #2684
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
If the user passes
unsafe=True, we now support convertingCeilconditions toBool, and#Existsconditions.I'm pretty sure the transformation is actually safe, but seeing as how this has only been a problem in the summarizer we can mark it as unsafe for now.
These cases were discovered when @jberthold was trying the summarizer on a new proof, and the conditions given back by the prover contained
#Ceiland#Existsconditions. This will make it easier to track down what part of the specification needed to change.