New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

docs: fix missing codeblock backtick #59

Merged

Veykril merged 1 commit into rust-analyzer:master from MultisampledNight:fix-missing-backtick

Sep 22, 2023

Contributor

MultisampledNight commented Sep 20, 2023

The size comparison was missing the backticks needed in order to format it as inline codeblock, which caused it to display like this:

`size_of::() == 24 (therefor == size_of::() on 64 bit platforms)

However, with this PR it'll be displayed like this:

size_of::<SmolStr>() == 24 (therefor == size_of::<String>() on 64 bit platforms)


          docs: fix missing codeblock backtick

0b0514b

Member

Veykril commented Sep 22, 2023

Thanks!

Veykril merged commit 8734783 into rust-analyzer:master

1 check passed

Veykril mentioned this pull request

Minor typos #60

Closed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet