Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 2, 2020. It is now read-only.

Update cortex-m version requirement to allow using 0.6.0 #32

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 15, 2019

Conversation

adamgreig
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@adamgreig adamgreig requested a review from a team as a code owner March 14, 2019 22:00
@rust-highfive
Copy link

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @korken89 (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

bors bot added a commit to rust-embedded/cortex-m-rt that referenced this pull request Mar 15, 2019
183: Update cortex-m version requirement to allow using 0.6.0 r=therealprof a=adamgreig

See also rust-embedded/cortex-m-semihosting#32

Co-authored-by: Adam Greig <adam@adamgreig.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@therealprof therealprof left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@therealprof
Copy link
Contributor

bors r+

bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 15, 2019
32: Update cortex-m version requirement to allow using 0.6.0 r=therealprof a=adamgreig



Co-authored-by: Adam Greig <adam@adamgreig.com>
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented Mar 15, 2019

Build succeeded

@bors bors bot merged commit a3c5523 into master Mar 15, 2019
@bors bors bot deleted the cortex-m-version branch March 15, 2019 01:39
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants