-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Status of the project "ECS Bench Suite" #130
Comments
Reasons why I'm posting it here:
|
It seems to have served its purpose.
I’m in agreement with archiving it. |
From the Bevy perspective: I'm on board with archiving this. Definitely interested in sharing knowledge (including places where projects are leaving performance on the floor) between ECS projects going forward, but I don't think that the payoff on maintaining microbenchmarks is there. |
It'd have some value if it was actively maintained, but nobody's stepping up to do so, so let's drop it rather than leaving it in limbo indefinitely. |
Thanks for the input 😄 I'm going to wait until Sat Nov 26, then, if there aren't any dissenting opinions, I'm going to add a |
Somebody asked on Discord the status of the project ECS Bench Suite.
I've had a look and it seemed abandoned-ish. Is there any intention to maintain it? @ozkriff mentioned Ralith and @erlend-sh.
Generally speaking, archiving a repository makes the status unambigious. In this particular case, this is even a more sensitive topic, since presenting outdated results can be misleading.
In theory, maintaining it should be very lightweight, as API changes should be small (I haven't checked though), and the diagrams are automatically updated (after the test suite is run).
On the other hand, "serious" maintenance is on another level, as it requires discussing and critically reviewing the benchmark themselves (in practice, dealing with issues like this).
I'm no fan of microbenchmarks, so I'd archive it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: