add non-regression run-make test for issues 125474, 125484, and 125646

tests/run-make/issue-125484-used-dependencies/dependency.rs

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+// Empty

tests/run-make/issue-125484-used-dependencies/main.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+pub type Foo = something::same::Thing;
+
+mod something {
+    pub mod same {
+        pub struct Thing;
+    }
+}
+
+fn main() {}

tests/run-make/issue-125484-used-dependencies/rmake.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+// Non-regression test for issues #125474, #125484, #125646, with the repro taken from #125484. Some
+// queries use "used dependencies" while others use "speculatively loaded dependencies", and an
+// indexing ICE appeared in some cases when these were unexpectedly used in the same context.
+
+// FIXME: this should probably be a UI test instead of a run-make test, but I *cannot* find a way to
+// make compiletest annotations reproduce the ICE with the minimizations from issues #125474 and
+// #125484.
+
+use run_make_support::{rustc, tmp_dir};
+
+fn main() {
+    // The dependency is not itself significant, apart from sharing a name with one of main's
+    // modules.
+    rustc().crate_name("same").crate_type("rlib").input("dependency.rs").run();
+
+    // Here, an ICE would happen when building the linker command.
+    rustc().input("main.rs").extern_("same", tmp_dir().join("libsame.rlib")).run();
+}