Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

doc: clarify caret requirements #12679

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 16, 2023
Merged

doc: clarify caret requirements #12679

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 16, 2023

Conversation

tompscanlan
Copy link
Contributor

What does this PR try to resolve?

clearing up caret version requirements

possibly fixes #12112

How should we test and review this PR?

expert review...

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Sep 15, 2023

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @epage (or someone else) soon.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (S-waiting-on-review and S-waiting-on-author) stays updated, invoking these commands when appropriate:

  • @rustbot author: the review is finished, PR author should check the comments and take action accordingly
  • @rustbot review: the author is ready for a review, this PR will be queued again in the reviewer's queue

@rustbot rustbot added A-documenting-cargo-itself Area: Cargo's documentation S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 15, 2023
Copy link
Member

@weihanglo weihanglo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks way better than I expected! Is this ready to merge?

@tompscanlan
Copy link
Contributor Author

tompscanlan commented Sep 16, 2023 via email

@weihanglo weihanglo changed the title WIP doc: clarify caret requirements doc: clarify caret requirements Sep 16, 2023
@weihanglo
Copy link
Member

Thanks! You've done a great job so I don't have to change any word :)

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 16, 2023

📌 Commit 0454f95 has been approved by weihanglo

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 16, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 16, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 0454f95 with merge 4c10811...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 16, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: weihanglo
Pushing 4c10811 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 4c10811 into rust-lang:master Sep 16, 2023
19 checks passed
@tompscanlan tompscanlan deleted the caret-doc branch September 16, 2023 13:09
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2023
Update cargo

6 commits in d5336f813df39d476e61fc46daabb1446350660a..b4ddf95ad9954118ac0dae835f2966394ad04c02
2023-09-14 19:55:49 +0000 to 2023-09-18 03:48:09 +0000
- doc: differentiate defaults for split-debuginfo (rust-lang/cargo#12680)
- feat(cli): Add '-n' to dry-run (rust-lang/cargo#12660)
- feat: stabilize credential-process and registry-auth (rust-lang/cargo#12649)
- refactor: use `RegistryOrIndex` enum to replace two booleans (rust-lang/cargo#12677)
- doc: clarify caret requirements (rust-lang/cargo#12679)
- feat(pkgid): Allow incomplete versions when unambigious (rust-lang/cargo#12614)

r? ghost
@ehuss ehuss added this to the 1.74.0 milestone Sep 30, 2023
@tompscanlan tompscanlan restored the caret-doc branch October 15, 2023 13:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-documenting-cargo-itself Area: Cargo's documentation S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

subtle documentation ambiguity
6 participants