-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(update): Tell users when they are still behind #13372
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
19 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f49a8f4
test(update): Show behind on breaking
epage 47a006e
feat(update): Show available breaking versions
epage e7f1009
test(update): Latest alpha is shown
epage a1db0b1
fix(update): Don't bother listing pre-release
epage 94f67d0
test(update): Compare verbose with and without updates
epage 8a25085
refactor(update): Pull out package_id search
epage c75feb9
refactor(update): Use set terminology
epage b4ad206
test(update): Show behavior for missing feature
epage c89ac1f
feat(update): Summarize unchanged packages with updates
epage 21dfe88
fix(update): Call out pre-releases when relevant
epage 967e199
test(update): Remove unnecesary verbose
epage b05dc26
fix(update): Help people discover how they pull in a stale dep
epage 0034ea3
test(update): Show lack of message on old
epage b7a0d9b
refactor(update): Pull out latest formatting logic
epage de15651
refactor(update): Pull out is_latest check
epage 90b10cd
refactor(update): Simplify Upgrade/Downgrade display logic
epage dce58dc
fix(update): Show updates for all relevant packages
epage 012ca52
fix(update): Start note/warn with lowercase
epage 93e369a
refactor(update): Clarify return type
epage File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggestion: I think writing
unchanged_behind > 0
would be more idiomatic (and easier to parse for me, at least)?And even then, it's a little unclear to me what this condition is about. Maybe add a comment?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
While there is yoda speak (
constant == variable
) and more general speak (variable == constant
) for equality, I see comparison operators differently and prefer to write them in number line order as I find that easier to read.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am on the same side of djc regarding the order, but not really a blocker.