Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(source): More RecursivePathSource clean up #14231

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jul 11, 2024

Conversation

epage
Copy link
Contributor

@epage epage commented Jul 10, 2024

What does this PR try to resolve?

This is a follow up to #13993 and #14169 and is part of my work towards #10752.

How should we test and review this PR?

Additional information

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jul 10, 2024

r? @weihanglo

rustbot has assigned @weihanglo.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added Command-read-manifest S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 10, 2024
@epage epage marked this pull request as draft July 10, 2024 20:35
@epage epage marked this pull request as ready for review July 10, 2024 20:51
epage added a commit to epage/cargo that referenced this pull request Jul 10, 2024
This came up in rust-lang#14231
```
---- expected: tests/testsuite/lto.rs:611:27
++++ actual:   stderr
   1    1 | [FRESH] registry-shared v0.0.1
   2    2 | [FRESH] registry v0.0.1
   3    3 | [COMPILING] bar v0.0.0 ([ROOT]/foo/bar)
   4    4 | [RUNNING] `rustc --crate-name bar [..]-C lto [..]--test [..]`
   5    5 | [RUNNING] `rustc --crate-name b [..]-C lto [..]--test [..]`
   6      - [FINISHED] `release` profile [optimized] target(s) in [ELAPSED]s
   7    6 | [RUNNING] `[ROOT]/foo/target/release/deps/bar-[HASH][EXE]`
   8    7 | [RUNNING] `[ROOT]/foo/target/release/deps/b-[HASH][EXE]`
   9    8 | [DOCTEST] bar
  10    9 | [RUNNING] `rustdoc --edition=2015 --crate-type cdylib --crate-type rlib --crate-name bar --test [..]-C lto [..]
       10 + [FINISHED] `release` profile [optimized] target(s) in 1m 00s

Update with SNAPSHOTS=overwrite
```
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 10, 2024
fix(test): Redact elapsed time in the minutes time frame

### What does this PR try to resolve?

This came up in #14231
```
---- expected: tests/testsuite/lto.rs:611:27
++++ actual:   stderr
   1    1 | [FRESH] registry-shared v0.0.1
   2    2 | [FRESH] registry v0.0.1
   3    3 | [COMPILING] bar v0.0.0 ([ROOT]/foo/bar)
   4    4 | [RUNNING] `rustc --crate-name bar [..]-C lto [..]--test [..]`
   5    5 | [RUNNING] `rustc --crate-name b [..]-C lto [..]--test [..]`
   6      - [FINISHED] `release` profile [optimized] target(s) in [ELAPSED]s
   7    6 | [RUNNING] `[ROOT]/foo/target/release/deps/bar-[HASH][EXE]`
   8    7 | [RUNNING] `[ROOT]/foo/target/release/deps/b-[HASH][EXE]`
   9    8 | [DOCTEST] bar
  10    9 | [RUNNING] `rustdoc --edition=2015 --crate-type cdylib --crate-type rlib --crate-name bar --test [..]-C lto [..]
       10 + [FINISHED] `release` profile [optimized] target(s) in 1m 00s

Update with SNAPSHOTS=overwrite
```

### How should we test and review this PR?

### Additional information
@epage epage force-pushed the git-clean branch 2 times, most recently from cb606d6 to 4c705a4 Compare July 11, 2024 18:34
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 11, 2024

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #14238) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

This prepares the way for moving `walk` from `read_packages` into here.
This is tied to the `Source` and only used there.
Primary benefit: looking to track more state in `RecursivePathSource`
and this is a stepping stone.

Minor benefits:
- Cleaner
- Avoid re-allocating
- Faster lookup for `download`
Copy link
Member

@Muscraft Muscraft left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@Muscraft
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 11, 2024

📌 Commit 848dd7f has been approved by Muscraft

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 11, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 11, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 848dd7f with merge cf38b96...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 11, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Muscraft
Pushing cf38b96 to master...

@bors bors merged commit cf38b96 into rust-lang:master Jul 11, 2024
20 checks passed
@epage epage deleted the git-clean branch July 12, 2024 00:57
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2024
fix(source): Don't warn about unreferenced duplicate packages

### What does this PR try to resolve?

This also improves the message, consolidating multiple duplicates and saying which was loaded instead, as it naturally fell out of the design

Fixes #10752

### How should we test and review this PR?

### Additional information

We're still subject to #13724 and fully load every manifest, even if we don't use it.  I'm exploring that topic at https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/246057-t-cargo/topic/Redundant.20code.20in.20.60GitSouce.60.3F/near/450783427

This change builds on
- #13993
- #14169
- #14231
- #14234
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2024
Update cargo

31 commits in 154fdac39ae9629954e19e9986fd2cf2cdd8d964..a2b58c3dad4d554ba01ed6c45c41ff85390560f2
2024-07-07 01:28:23 +0000 to 2024-07-16 00:52:02 +0000
- chore(ci): bump CI tools (rust-lang/cargo#14257)
- test: migrate fetch and list_availables to snapbox (rust-lang/cargo#14214)
- chore: downgrade to jobserver@0.1.28 (rust-lang/cargo#14254)
- perf(source): Don't `du` on every git source load (rust-lang/cargo#14252)
- fix(source): Don't warn about unreferenced duplicate packages (rust-lang/cargo#14239)
- feat(test): Add cargo_test to test-support prelude (rust-lang/cargo#14243)
- Add workflow to publish Cargo automatically (rust-lang/cargo#14202)
- test: migrate implicit_features to snapbox (rust-lang/cargo#14245)
- test: migrate build-std/main to snapbox (rust-lang/cargo#14241)
- test: migrate check_cfg to snapbox (rust-lang/cargo#14235)
- refactor(source): More RecursivePathSource clean up (rust-lang/cargo#14231)
- Add more profiling traces (rust-lang/cargo#14238)
- fix(overrides): Don't warn on duplicate packages from using '..' (rust-lang/cargo#14234)
- fix(test): Redact elapsed time in the minutes time frame (rust-lang/cargo#14233)
- test: Migrate lto tests to snapbox (rust-lang/cargo#14209)
- fix: Ensure dep/feature activates the dependency on 2024 (rust-lang/cargo#14221)
- chore(docs): update index of reference (rust-lang/cargo#14228)
- test: migrate test to snapbox (rust-lang/cargo#14226)
- chore: remove duplicate words (rust-lang/cargo#14229)
- docs(contrib): Document things I look for in RFCs (rust-lang/cargo#14222)
- docs(ref): Note MSRV for features in the docs (rust-lang/cargo#14224)
- test(progress): Resolve flakiness (rust-lang/cargo#14223)
- fix(test): Reduce over-prescription to the caller (rust-lang/cargo#14217)
- refactor: move get_source_id out of registry (rust-lang/cargo#14218)
- fix: rename to `rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links` (rust-lang/cargo#14215)
- test: migrate member_errors, multitarget and new to snapbox (rust-lang/cargo#14210)
- test: migrate generate_lockfile and glob_targets to snapbox (rust-lang/cargo#14200)
- test: Ensure --list test works with cargo-bloat (rust-lang/cargo#14213)
- dont make new constant InternedString in hot path (rust-lang/cargo#14211)
- Fix compatible_with_older_cargo test. (rust-lang/cargo#14212)
- test: migrate metabuild, metadata and net_config to snapbox (rust-lang/cargo#14162)
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.81.0 milestone Jul 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Command-read-manifest S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants