Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

restructure Activations for better clone #5147

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Eh2406
Copy link
Contributor

@Eh2406 Eh2406 commented Mar 7, 2018

This builds on the work in #5121 When we last met we had:
5000000 ticks in ~48 sec, 0r 104k ticks/sec
This small change brings us to:
5000000 ticks in ~21 sec, 0r 238k ticks/sec
Edit: sorry for the large diff only the last commit is new. The rest are from #5121

@rust-highfive
Copy link

r? @alexcrichton

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

😲

auto-r+ from me as soon as #5121 is sorted out

@Eh2406
Copy link
Contributor Author

Eh2406 commented Mar 8, 2018

Rebased so that the diff only shows the one relovent commit.

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 8, 2018

📌 Commit 8f9ada8 has been approved by alexcrichton

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 8, 2018

⌛ Testing commit 8f9ada8 with merge 6535475...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2018
restructure `Activations` for better clone

This builds on the work in #5121 When we last met we had:
5000000 ticks in ~48 sec, 0r 104k ticks/sec
This small change brings us to:
5000000 ticks in ~21 sec, 0r 238k ticks/sec
Edit: sorry for the large diff only the last commit is new. The rest are from #5121
@Eh2406 Eh2406 closed this Mar 8, 2018
@Eh2406 Eh2406 deleted the restucture branch March 8, 2018 04:17
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@Eh2406 oh I think the branch was deleted before this was merged?

@Eh2406
Copy link
Contributor Author

Eh2406 commented Mar 8, 2018

Oops, sorry. What is the best way to fix this, should I post a new PR?

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

Yeah that's probably best, and no worries!

@Eh2406 Eh2406 restored the restucture branch March 8, 2018 04:46
@Eh2406
Copy link
Contributor Author

Eh2406 commented Mar 8, 2018

Github claims this PR can be reopened, and that it is redundant to post a new one.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 8, 2018

💥 Test timed out

@Eh2406 Eh2406 mentioned this pull request Mar 8, 2018
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2018
More interning

This is a small part of the unsuccessful last commit of #5121, this part removes `InternedString::new` from the innerest of loops.

This is mostly a resubmission of #5147, that I accidentally deleted while bors was testing. This one has new commits, so github will take the resubition.
@Eh2406 Eh2406 deleted the restucture branch March 8, 2018 16:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants