Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tweak stale bot's configs #6058

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 20, 2018
Merged

Tweak stale bot's configs #6058

merged 3 commits into from
Sep 20, 2018

Conversation

dwijnand
Copy link
Member

Refs #6035

r? @wycats

@dwijnand
Copy link
Member Author

I've allowed "edits from maintainers" so feel free to push to my branch with amends - if you'd like.

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+

I'm gonna go ahead and land this to get the updated configs in, but we can certainly continue to iterate on wording!

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 20, 2018

📌 Commit 49e9e4a has been approved by alexcrichton

@dwijnand
Copy link
Member Author

Yep 💯

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 20, 2018
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 20, 2018

⌛ Testing commit 49e9e4a with merge 7c34b13...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 20, 2018

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: alexcrichton
Pushing 7c34b13 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 49e9e4a into rust-lang:master Sep 20, 2018
@dwijnand dwijnand deleted the tweak-stale-bot branch September 20, 2018 21:05
@@ -38,7 +31,7 @@ markComment: >
acceptable!

closeComment: >
As I didn't see any updates I'm going to close this due to being stale.
As I didn't see any updates in 30 days I'm going to close this.
Please see the previous comment for more information!
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe add something about when it would be appropriate to reopen (or whom to ping if the person reading the comment is not the original reporter)?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure!

I think just commenting should be enough, as we have enough repo watchers.

In terms of "when" what were you thinking?

@ehuss ehuss added this to the 1.31.0 milestone Feb 6, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants