Skip to content

Rename cio-markdown package to cargo-registry-markdown #3958

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 30, 2021

Conversation

Turbo87
Copy link
Member

@Turbo87 Turbo87 commented Sep 26, 2021

This is consistent with cargo-registry and cargo-registry-s3.

We could also consider renaming cargo-registry-s3 to cio-s3 to make the name shorter, but as long as the main package is called cargo-registry I guess we should us that as the prefix for the other packages too.

@Turbo87 Turbo87 added C-internal 🔧 Category: Nonessential work that would make the codebase more consistent or clear A-backend ⚙️ labels Sep 26, 2021
@Turbo87 Turbo87 requested review from JohnTitor and 0xPoe September 26, 2021 08:56
This is consistent with `cargo-registry` and `cargo-registry-s3`.
Copy link
Member

@JohnTitor JohnTitor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@JohnTitor
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 30, 2021

📌 Commit 669a5d7 has been approved by JohnTitor

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 30, 2021

⌛ Testing commit 669a5d7 with merge f4ed6bb...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 30, 2021

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: JohnTitor
Pushing f4ed6bb to master...

@bors bors merged commit f4ed6bb into rust-lang:master Sep 30, 2021
@Turbo87 Turbo87 deleted the rename-pkg branch October 1, 2021 14:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-backend ⚙️ C-internal 🔧 Category: Nonessential work that would make the codebase more consistent or clear
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants