Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Lock file maintenance (JS) #9089

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 15, 2024
Merged

Lock file maintenance (JS) #9089

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 15, 2024

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jul 15, 2024

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Update Change
lockFileMaintenance All locks refreshed

🔧 This Pull Request updates lock files to use the latest dependency versions.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am on Monday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@Turbo87 Turbo87 enabled auto-merge (squash) July 15, 2024 06:31
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 15, 2024

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably fa0a007) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/js-lock-file-maintenance branch from 1aa6a3c to 2b807e1 Compare July 15, 2024 06:32
@Turbo87 Turbo87 merged commit 801cc33 into main Jul 15, 2024
9 checks passed
@Turbo87 Turbo87 deleted the renovate/js-lock-file-maintenance branch July 15, 2024 06:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants