-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 221
Migration fixes #385
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
QuietMisdreavus
merged 2 commits into
rust-lang:master
from
Mark-Simulacrum:migration-fixes
Jul 25, 2019
Merged
Migration fixes #385
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you think it would be useful to run the database query anyway, and instead of switching on
content = 'in-s3', switch on whether the row exists in the table? I know it makes no difference for the production service, but it feels more resilient for anyone who hosts their own version of it and transitions to S3 after being online for a while.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd prefer not to, as it does add some amount of overhead and to an extent makes the code more complex.
move-to-s3should be the preferred route for migrating local installations to S3.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Right, i'm just thinking about the period between saving S3 credentials into the environment and the moment
cratesfyi database move-to-s3finishes. Any calls to the website in that time will fail because we won't be looking at the database for the files.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's true. move-to-s3 is no longer an operation that can run in the background. Since it's likely to never be used again outside local installations though that seems fine -- and if in the future there is a desire to make that happen the code change isn't really that bad.