-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 381
explain time-with-isolation test better #3379
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
f1d8f15
to
31f2ecd
Compare
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ | |||
The loop took around 7s | |||
(It's fine for this number to change a bit when you `--bless` this test.) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How much is "a bit"? The recent rust-lang/rust PR changed this number from 7 to 12 which is quite a large swing normally, but per the comment in the source code within an order of magnitude is fine.
So probably we should say "within an order of magnitude" here if that is our expectation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We can also just say "it is okay to change"; we'll get pinged anyway when it happens so we can intervene if something seems to go terribly wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Works for me!
31f2ecd
to
f0c8848
Compare
r=me |
@bors r=saethlin (Btw, you should have "r+" powers here. :) |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Fixes #3377
@saethlin do you think this is better?