Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Infered lifetime bounds (RFC 2093) #289

Open
3 tasks
matthewjasper opened this issue Apr 3, 2018 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #1063
Open
3 tasks

Infered lifetime bounds (RFC 2093) #289

matthewjasper opened this issue Apr 3, 2018 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #1063
Labels
RFC Stabilization Docs Documentation required for stabilizing a feature
Milestone

Comments

@matthewjasper
Copy link
Contributor

See rust-lang/rust#44493

  • Document existing inferred lifetime bounds in functions and impls
  • Document feature. Should this be documented with the existing inferred bounds?
  • Make use of in examples
@matthewjasper matthewjasper added S-waiting-on-stabilization Waiting for a stabilization PR to be merged in the main Rust repository RFC Stabilization Docs Documentation required for stabilizing a feature labels Apr 3, 2018
@matthewjasper matthewjasper added this to the Rust 2018 milestone Apr 3, 2018
@tlyu
Copy link
Contributor

tlyu commented Jul 6, 2021

I think this should have S-waiting-on-stabilization removed; the tracking ticket rust-lang/rust#44493 has closed (notably with the "Adjust documentation" step unchecked). (I'll try to get rustbot to do it, but I might not have permissions.)

@rustbot label -S-waiting-on-stabilization

@rustbot

This comment has been minimized.

@ehuss ehuss removed the S-waiting-on-stabilization Waiting for a stabilization PR to be merged in the main Rust repository label Jul 6, 2021
@tlyu
Copy link
Contributor

tlyu commented Jul 6, 2021

I'm willing to work on a PR for this. The "Reference-level explanation" in rust-lang/rfcs#2093 is quite verbose and possibly better suited for implementation documentation. I think I won't copy it directly, but maybe try to summarize it in a way that is accurate enough.

@rustbot claim

@tlyu tlyu linked a pull request Jul 8, 2021 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
RFC Stabilization Docs Documentation required for stabilizing a feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants