Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Tupple index vs integer literal #735

Closed
martin-t opened this issue Dec 30, 2019 · 0 comments · Fixed by #814
Closed

Tupple index vs integer literal #735

martin-t opened this issue Dec 30, 2019 · 0 comments · Fixed by #814
Labels
A-lexer Area: Lexical specification Easy We believe this would not be difficult to actually fix

Comments

@martin-t
Copy link

The section about integer literals got expanded in 8e79044 to include tupple inxex but the surrounding text did not.

  • It still says an integer literal has 4 forms instead of 5.

  • It talks about suffixes but a tupple index can't have a suffix. It also discussed types but a tupple index probably doesn't really have a type since it only exists at compile time.
@ehuss ehuss added A-lexer Area: Lexical specification Easy We believe this would not be difficult to actually fix labels Apr 4, 2020
@ehuss ehuss mentioned this issue May 16, 2020
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
A-lexer Area: Lexical specification Easy We believe this would not be difficult to actually fix
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Update tuple index token. ehuss/reference
2 participants
@ehuss @martin-t