Skip to content

Clean up some inline assembly examples #1804

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 3, 2025

Conversation

ehuss
Copy link
Contributor

@ehuss ehuss commented Apr 28, 2025

These examples all include an extraneous let x = 5;, where the x variable is never used anywhere. Presumably this was a copy-paste scenario with similar tests that do use x. I'm removing these since the extra variable could distract from the intent of the example.

These examples all include an extraneous `let x = 5;`, where the `x`
variable is never used anywhere. Presumably this was a copy-paste
scenario with similar tests that do use `x`. I'm removing these since
the extra variable could distract from the intent of the example.
@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: The marked PR is awaiting review from a maintainer label Apr 28, 2025
@ehuss ehuss added this pull request to the merge queue May 3, 2025
Merged via the queue into rust-lang:master with commit a763960 May 3, 2025
5 checks passed
GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request May 5, 2025
Update books

## rust-lang/reference

9 commits in 3bf3402aea982b876eb56c87da17b0685c6461d5..387392674d74656f7cb437c05a96f0c52ea8e601
2025-05-03 21:29:09 UTC to 2025-04-22 15:25:03 UTC

- Document `let_chains` again (rust-lang/reference#1740)
- Add: orphan rule rationale. (rust-lang/reference#1755)
- Remove apologies about the Reference (rust-lang/reference#1792)
- Clean up some inline assembly examples (rust-lang/reference#1804)
- Remove StructExprTuple and StructExprUnit (rust-lang/reference#1803)
- Improve documentation of struct expressions (rust-lang/reference#1799)
- Clarify interaction of asm-goto with IBT (rust-lang/reference#1790)
- naked functions (rust-lang/reference#1689)
- Relabel grammarRailroad-Button (rust-lang/reference#1798)

## rust-lang/rust-by-example

3 commits in 0d7964d5b22cf920237ef1282d869564b4883b88..8a8918c698534547fa8a1a693cb3e7277f0bfb2f
2025-04-30 12:20:49 UTC to 2025-04-22 17:42:30 UTC

-   The example is not meant to be compiled. Changed the code block ann… (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1926)
- Non-tail recursive call note in testcase_linked_list.md (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1924)
- docs: mark illustrative 'static lifetime example with `ignore` (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1923)
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 6, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#140676 - rustbot:docs-update, r=ehuss

Update books

## rust-lang/reference

9 commits in 3bf3402aea982b876eb56c87da17b0685c6461d5..387392674d74656f7cb437c05a96f0c52ea8e601
2025-05-03 21:29:09 UTC to 2025-04-22 15:25:03 UTC

- Document `let_chains` again (rust-lang/reference#1740)
- Add: orphan rule rationale. (rust-lang/reference#1755)
- Remove apologies about the Reference (rust-lang/reference#1792)
- Clean up some inline assembly examples (rust-lang/reference#1804)
- Remove StructExprTuple and StructExprUnit (rust-lang/reference#1803)
- Improve documentation of struct expressions (rust-lang/reference#1799)
- Clarify interaction of asm-goto with IBT (rust-lang/reference#1790)
- naked functions (rust-lang/reference#1689)
- Relabel grammarRailroad-Button (rust-lang/reference#1798)

## rust-lang/rust-by-example

3 commits in 0d7964d5b22cf920237ef1282d869564b4883b88..8a8918c698534547fa8a1a693cb3e7277f0bfb2f
2025-04-30 12:20:49 UTC to 2025-04-22 17:42:30 UTC

-   The example is not meant to be compiled. Changed the code block ann… (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1926)
- Non-tail recursive call note in testcase_linked_list.md (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1924)
- docs: mark illustrative 'static lifetime example with `ignore` (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1923)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: The marked PR is awaiting review from a maintainer
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants