Fix a bug in uambiguous prefixes. #290
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Specifically, given the strings ABCX, CDAX and BCX, it was reporting the unambiguous set as A, BCX and CDAX, which is wrong since A is a substring of CDAX. unambiguous_prefixes is now quite a bit of a mess, but so is the rest of the literal extraction code. The only thing it has going for it is a massive test suite. Fixes rust-lang#289
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Specifically, given the strings ABCX, CDAX and BCX, it was reporting
the unambiguous set as A, BCX and CDAX, which is wrong since A is a
substring of CDAX.
unambiguous_prefixes is now quite a bit of a mess, but so is the rest
of the literal extraction code. The only thing it has going for it is
a massive test suite.
Fixes #289