Add license matching Rust #1372
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
r? @brson |
|
For the record, in theory, everyone who already contributed to the repository needs to agree to the license. |
|
Yeah, we can't just do this. It was a big blunder that we didn't from the outset. |
|
I'm going to close this. If we think it's worth pursuing now we can discuss relicensing, but it's a mess. With the RFC repo in particular there's also the important question of what license people's comments have since they are a pretty important part of the overall artifact. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As discussed in rust-lang/rust#25664 and #1259 , this repo is basically part of Rust but needs to make its licensing information explicit.